The Hill
Friday, July 03, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Democrats push through new rules package
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Democrats push through new rules package
Posted: 01/06/09 08:29 PM [ET]

House Republicans Tuesday lost their fight to retain the minority’s ability to force potentially embarrassing floor votes when the lower chamber voted 242-181 to pass the rules package for the 111th Congress.

Most Democrats supported the power consolidating package with the exception of six members who crossed the aisle. Reps. Ed Pastor (Ariz.), Brian Baird (Wash.), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Michael Michaud (Maine) and Walt Minnick (Idaho) opposed the rules changes.

Republicans cried foul on the floor Tuesday afternoon, charging House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) with setting a divisive tone on the first day of the 111th Congress, in contrast to President-elect Obama's message of inclusion and unity.

“It sets the stage for even more closed, bitter, rancorous debate,” Rules Committee ranking Republican David Dreier of California said during the debate over a package that eliminates the six-year term limits for committee chairmen, makes exceptions to the pay-as-you-go rule and renews the House lawsuit against former White House counsel Harriet Miers and President Bush’s chief of staff Joshua Bolten.

However, one of the most contentious issues included in the rules package is a revision to the way Republicans may amend a bill before final passage. The passed rules package allows Democrats to remove the GOP’s ability to offer a “motion to recommit” a bill “promptly,” which in effect kills the underlying legislation.   

Democrats argue that Republicans will still have the opportunity to offer amendments to legislation in the final stages, i.e. “forthwith” - they just won’t be able to use that amendment for political gimmicks, according to Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.).
“Members have said on the other side, they want to be able to offer an alternative. Nothing in this proposal diminishes their ability to offer an alternative. They are fully able to offer an alternative as an amendment. What they are losing is a legislative Ponzi scheme,” Frank argued.

But Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), the former minority whip, shot down those claims and listed a number of instances when the minority party’s use of motions to recommit “promptly” led to “improve legislation, not kill it.”

“Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann offered a promptly motion to recommit on housing legislation that would make illegal immigrants ineligible for financial assistance. Democrats pulled the bill, reintroduced it incorporating Mrs. Bachmann’s motion and the legislation passed,” Blunt said during the debate leading up to a vote on the minority party’s alternate rules package that failed along party lines.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.