The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Democrats weigh lame-duck session, make recess plans
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Democrats weigh lame-duck session, make recess plans


The schedule also depends on the presidential election. Many observers say if Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) is elected, Democratic leaders would have no need to reconvene in the waning days of the Bush administration, when Bush still holds veto power. But if Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is elected, it becomes more possible because Senate Democrats may prefer to deal with a weakened, departing Bush than a fresh, emboldened President McCain.

Perhaps the single most decisive factor is the length of any funding resolution that is passed next week. If the resolution is a short-term stopgap measure, until November or December, then a December lame-duck session becomes unavoidable. But at least one of several ideas being pushed by Democratic leaders in the Senate would be a longer-term measure that would fund the government into next February.

A November or December lame duck could let the steam out of the offshore drilling issue and avoid a government shutdown debate that would be perilous for both parties.

Absent a lame duck, Congress and the White House appear to be on a collision course. The current moratorium on drilling must be addressed by a continuing resolution, but Bush has threatened to veto the only drilling plan that’s been passed by the Democratic Congress.

“If the president wishes to kill funding for the government, that’s his decision,” said Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), assistant to the Speaker. “But we’re going to put together a good CR.”

One key Democrat said Thursday he had “real concern” that the moratorium on drilling could go away entirely at the end of the month. That could even worry some Republicans in coastal districts with tourism economies, because it would allow drilling three miles off the coasts. At that distance, rigs would be easily visible from beaches.

House Democratic leaders met for more than an hour Thursday. During the first part of the meeting, they huddled with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who has become their go-to economist, on the troubles in the financial industry. But must of the rest of the meeting was on their end-game strategy.

Pelosi did indicate that she wanted a continuing resolution done before moving on to an economic stimulus package.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.