The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Dems aim to outmaneuver Bush by combining spending bills
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Dems aim to outmaneuver Bush by combining spending bills
Posted: 11/01/07 07:48 PM [ET]
Democrats moved Wednesday to combine three spending bills in an effort to prevent President Bush from vetoing the Labor-Health and Human Services bill, or to pave the way for a veto override.

In response, Republicans charged that Democrats are “holding the troops hostage” to political maneuvering.

The actions represent initial skirmishes in a spending fight between Bush and congressional Democrats likely to dominate Congress the rest of the year.

House leaders are combining the controversial so-called “Labor-H” bill with the defense spending bill and military construction bill, which includes veterans’ funding. Bush has threatened to veto the Labor-H bill, but not defense or veterans’ funding.

“That would be tough to veto,” said Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.), a member of the House Appropriations Committee. “The president’s priority is two of the three bills. Our priority is all three of the bills. If we tie them together, some might think the president might do the responsible thing.”

But Rep. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) warned that the president will veto such a combined package, delaying funding for troops and veterans.

“Holding the troops hostage in a time of war is something we’ve never done,” said House Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.).

House Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) questioned Republicans’ dire predictions of delay, noting that after Republicans lost last year’s elections, they decided not to even pass a military construction bill for the year.

“I’d like to know where that same concern was last year,” Obey said. “I will take a backseat to no one on taking care of our veterans. But we’re going to treat veterans as a whole person.”

Obey noted that Republicans sent 27 combined appropriations bills to Bush, who signed all of them.

“Now because one is coming from the Democratic Party, he wants to make a federal case out of it,” Obey said. “We are proceeding the way we are proceeding because we are playing off the president.”

Democratic aides are touting the Water Resources Development Act in the growing spending fight. President Bush has threatened a veto, but the water bill has veto-proof support in Congress.

If Bush vetoes it, he would face his first veto override. If he signs it, he’d be giving Democrats an initial victory in the spending fight. But he could also let the bill quietly become law on Nov. 4.
 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.