The Hill
Sunday, September 07, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Dems say ‘hidden’ costs could push price tag of Iraq war to $3.5 trillion through 2017
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Dems say ‘hidden’ costs could push price tag of Iraq war to $3.5 trillion through 2017
Posted: 11/13/07 02:46 PM [ET]

Democrats released a report Tuesday saying that a prolonged military presence in Iraq could result in costs of $3.5 trillion through 2017.

The report, a product of the majority staff of the Joint Economic Committee, puts the cost of the war to the average family of four at $16,500 to this point.

Committee Chairman Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the cost of the war cannot be measured simply by adding up the various supplemental appropriations bills. The senator added that other costs that must be considered include those resulting from “excessive borrowing, the instability in world oil markets, the future care of injured veterans, the necessary retooling of our military” and others.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said the costs of the war, both in “blood and treasure,” are “hard to even fathom.”

“President Bush said this war would cost $50 billion to $60 billion,” Hoyer said. “Lawrence Lindsey, then the top White House economic adviser, had the audacity to say it could cost $200 billion. And for his candor, Lindsey was shown the door. Today’s report shows that the true cost of this war will be many times greater than even Larry Lindsey could have predicted.”

The White House dismissed the report.

“This committee is known for being partisan and political,” said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino. “They did not consult or cooperate with the Republicans on the committee. And so I think it is an attempt to muddy the waters on what has been some positive developments being reported out of Iraq.”

However, Israel Klein, the committee’s spokesman and deputy staff director, rejected the White House criticism.

Instead of dealing with the substance of this report, the White House is once again trying to deflect attention away from the blistering costs of this war in Iraq,” he said. “This report uses the non-partisan CBO budget estimates and was prepared by the JEC’s professional economists using the same process this committee has always used, regardless of which party is in the majority.”

Hoyer said the report shows that it is time for a “responsible redeployment” of U.S. troops.

The $3.5 trillion figure assumes that the level of troops in Iraq will be reduced from 210,000 this year to 75,000 by 2013 and then remain at that level through 2017.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.