The Hill
Thursday, August 28, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Dems want special counsel for Gonzales
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Dems want special counsel for Gonzales
Posted: 07/26/07 12:53 PM [ET]
Senate Democrats Thursday called for a special counsel to investigate whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales perjured himself during congressional testimony.

Calling it a “sad moment,” Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) blasted what he categorized as the attorney general’s inability to answer questions in a straightforward manner.

“The attorney general took an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,” Schumer told reporters. “Instead, he tells the half-truth, the partial truth and everything but the truth. And he does it not once, and not twice, but over and over and over again. His instinct is not to tell the truth but to dissemble and deceive.”

Schumer, with Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), are asking Department of Justice (DoJ) Solicitor General Paul Clement to appoint a special counsel to determine whether statements Gonzales made before Congress were false.

Schumer pointed to several instances as potential offenses, including testimony Gonzales gave on whether there was internal dissent over a warrantless wiretapping program.

The New York senator believes that two statements Gonzales made with regard to the program may be false. Schumer noted other instances where the attorney general’s sworn testimony differed from that of others.

“He testified that he hadn’t talked to witnesses about the U.S. attorney investigation, but [former Justice Department White House liaison Monica Goodling] testified that she had a conversation with the attorney general that made her uncomfortable,” Schumer said.

“He also testified in 2005 that there were no abuses of the Patriot Act,” the senator added. “We have now learned that when he made those statements, the attorney general knew about a number of failures to protect rights under the Patriot Act.”

The group has the support of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) in its quest to find an investigator from outside the Justice Department to probe the charges made against Gonzales.

The White House continued to stand by its attorney general. Asked whether there were discrepancies between Gonzales’s testimony and documents and statements by others, White House spokesman Tony Snow said, “The attorney general was speaking consistently.”

“The president supports him,” Snow told reporters aboard Air Force One. “I think at some point this is going to be something where members are going to have to go behind closed doors and have a fuller discussion of the issues.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.