The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Dingell drops energy bill elements
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Dingell drops energy bill elements
Posted: 06/19/07 07:14 PM [ET]

Unable to resolve a disagreement with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and other Democrats, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) yesterday said he would introduce a revised energy bill that left out the more controversial elements of an earlier proposal.

In a memo sent yesterday at press time to committee members, Dingell said he planned to circulate an energy bill that addressed energy efficiency standards, a “smart” electricity grid, loan guarantees for “innovative” energy technologies and incentives for renewable fuels infrastructure.

Gone from the new draft, however, would be new fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks and language preventing California and other states from requiring greenhouse gas emissions reductions from tailpipes.

A dozen Democrats on the committee wrote Dingell to express “serious concerns” about the legislation. Pelosi said she in particular opposed the language to preempt California’s greenhouse gas efforts.

But Dingell said Democrats, in essence, were agreeing to disagree on those hot-button issues for now as they move forward on items that have broader support.

“This procedure for considering energy legislation at this time was discussed with the Speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way so that we can rapidly complete work on a bipartisan bill,” Dingell wrote.

Still, the chairman said the initial bill would include meaningful steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the new energy efficiency requirements would “remove from the atmosphere carbon dioxide emissions equivalent to those emitted from all cars currently on the road,” the letter stated, quoting estimates from the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy and the Alliance to Save Energy.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.