The Hill
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Door is left open for N.Y. ‘Hippie museum’ cash
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Door is left open for N.Y. ‘Hippie museum’ cash
Posted: 11/07/07 07:54 PM [ET]

Funding for a controversial “Hippie museum,” co-sponsored by presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), may still find a lifeline even though its earmark was stricken from a Senate appropriations bill earlier this year.

A conference report of two combined appropriations bills — Labor, Health and Human Services and Education (Labor-HHS) and the military construction-veterans’ affairs measure — removed a provision that would have explicitly cut funds for the museum, located in Bethel, N.Y. That clause was authored by earmark foe Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).

The conference agreement states there is no “general provision proposed by the Senate that prohibits the use of funds by the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) for the Bethel Performing Arts Center and makes certain other funding adjustments within the IMLS and Health Resources and Services Administration accounts.”

“It’s astonishing that the conferees removed the prohibition,” said John Hart, spokesman for Coburn. “Instead of a mini-bus or an omnibus, we may be looking at a groovy-bus strategy.”

According to a Democratic aide on the Senate Appropriations Committee, however, the Senate bill language, as originally drafted, would have prohibited the museum from applying for competitive grants from either IMLS or the Department of Education.

“They would have been the only museum specifically prohibited from competing. We did not believe that was the intent of the Coburn amendment,” said the aide.

The office of the project’s other co-sponsor, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), also said there were no funds for the museum in the bill’s conference report.

“The conference report does not contain any funding for the Bethel Woods Center for the Arts,” said Brian Fallon, spokesman for Schumer.

The Senate Appropriations aide added there is no intention to restore the earmark.

Hart disputed that: “Even if the bill does not provide funds for the museum, this bill opens a back door to fund the project. It is an earmark reincarnation.”  

One million dollars had been slated for the earmarked project. Planned to open in the spring of 2008, the museum is an interpretation of the 1969 Woodstock music festival and “the legacies of the Sixties,” according to the Bethel center’s website. Bethel is the original site of the festival.

The museum’s funds soon became a flashpoint in the Senate earlier this fall. Coburn targeted the earmark by offering to transfer the museum’s $1 million in federal funds to help finance addition healthcare for pregnant women and children. The Senate accepted Coburn’s measure.

Clinton’s co-sponsorship of the project also became campaign fodder in the presidential race. Presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) released a campaign ad poking fun at the earmark, contrasting Woodstock with his service in Vietnam.

Clinton’s office did not return messages asking for comment for this story.

Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group, said the language completely erases the earmark from the record, but it also removes the funding prohibition.

“You could potentially ‘backdoor’ it, but it would be difficult. It would have to compete with other funding priorities,” said Ellis.

As of press time, House lawmakers expected to vote on the 853-page bill Tuesday night, even though members only received a copy late Monday night. Ellis contended that is little time for members to know what they are voting on.

“It was irresponsible when the Republicans did it. It is irresponsible now with Democrats doing it,” he said.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.