The Hill
Monday, May 12, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Doubts grow over ethanol
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Doubts grow over ethanol
Posted: 04/30/08 08:01 PM [ET]

Sharply rising food prices may force Congress to reconsider the fivefold increase in ethanol production it mandated just four months ago, some lawmakers say.

Few members appear willing to call for the outright repeal of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS), which requires that 36 billion gallons of ethanol be produced by 2022. Of that, 15 billon gallons would come from corn.

But the new concerns represent a significant turn for a policy issue that was embraced by both congressional Democrats and President Bush as a way to boost rural economies and domestic energy security.

“We certainly did not anticipate what’s happened, if that was the cause,” said Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), ranking member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

“We don’t know how much of the food crisis was caused by it, but nobody expected it to cause much.”

Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) added: “I think it’s something we need to look at.”

When asked if he would be willing to change the mandate if it is found to have driven up food prices, Bingaman said: “Depending on what was concluded, I’m open to anything. But at this point, I don’t think we have good information as to the extent to which that is a factor.”

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), an ethanol supporter, also opened the possibility of revising the current ethanol policies.

“I supported ethanol from the beginning, and still believe in it. I believe biofuels have a great future,” Durbin said, “but we have to look at it honestly. What is the current impact and what do we have to do, if anything, to address any changes?”

Stoking the second thoughts is a loose collection of oil companies, livestock producers and grocers that tried unsuccessfully last year to block the RFS.

Oil companies don’t like the mandate because they say there is insufficient infrastructure to handle the big increase in ethanol. Livestock producers oppose the mandate because it has raised the price of the corn that they buy to feed cattle and hogs.

Grocers blame the mandate for rising food costs.  

Scott Faber, vice president for federal affairs at the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), compared lawmakers to late-night revelers who are just beginning to understand the consequences of their actions.

“A lot of lawmakers are wondering who the hell they woke up with,” Faber said.

Ethanol producers and farm groups representing corn growers strongly reject the suggestion that the RFS is a significant factor in the increase in global commodity prices.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.