The Hill
Saturday, September 06, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Enhance research on drug safety
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Enhance research on drug safety
Posted: 06/06/07 08:14 PM [ET]

Americans rely more than ever before on life-enhancing and life-saving pharmaceuticals. Growing concern about the way the Food and Drug Administration monitors drug risks and decides whether to let the public know about emerging risks — highlighted by the painkiller Vioxx three years ago and the diabetes drug Avandia today — obliges Congress to do whatever it can to improve public safety. The broad-based FDA legislation that’s making its way through Congress offers the biggest opportunity for important reforms. Other initiatives must also be taken.

In May, I reintroduced a proposal to improve the study of medical treatments, including the effectiveness and safety of drugs on the market. The legislation would give researchers at federal agencies and university-based and other research organizations highly controlled access to data on hospitals, physicians and prescription drug benefits that are provided to
Medicare beneficiaries while strictly protecting patient privacy.

There’s tremendous potential for improving the public safety by making this rich source of information available to experienced and credentialed researchers. Drug trials often include only a few hundred subjects. These trials are no match for the wealth of information that’s available after a drug is on the market and millions of people start taking it. The Medicare data initiative would tap that valuable information and dramatically benefit public safety and public health. It would do so in a way that makes sure the strongest safeguards are in place to protect privacy and confidentiality.

Medicare processes 500 million claims for benefits every year, and millions of prescriptions are filled annually through the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit. Information about these benefits would be a tremendous resource for qualified health services researchers, and it would help them conduct rigorous studies on the safety and effectiveness of various medical treatments.

Researchers also could help policymakers better understand why services that we know can help people maintain good health are not being used and to develop policies to promote their use.

The new bill, the Access to Medicare Data Act of 2007, is based on legislation that Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and I introduced last year. The bill’s provisions would apply to the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Researchers given access to information would be required to meet strict criteria, including significant expertise in analyzing the type and volume of data in question. They must also publish their methodology and findings, and they would be prohibited from selling the data or using it to create any commercial products. The researchers must have approval from a review board for the protection of human subjects that has exacting standards regarding the protection of identifiable information. They also must submit a data management plan that details measures that will be taken to safeguard the data and to protect the privacy of any beneficiary. Provider-specific information could not be made public.

The evidence piled up during the last three years and the experts who have weighed in, including the prestigious Institute of Medicine, all say that the nation’s surveillance of the safety of pharmaceuticals approved for use needs to be dramatically improved. The stakes are high for public safety and confidence in the marketplace of medicine. More and better study of the effects and efficacy of those drugs is key to reaching that goal.


Grassley is the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee.



SPECIAL SECTION: Healthcare
Congress should reauthorize SCHIP
Uterine fibroids: a silent epidemic
Solutions lie in private sector, not more government programs
The Healthy Americans Act takes burden off employers
Lab tests: today’s tools for detection, better treatment and greater savings
Bioscience companies deserve improved investment climate
The cure to the physician crisis

 

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.