The Hill
Friday, January 09, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow FISA  heads for showdown
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
FISA  heads for showdown
Posted: 02/12/08 08:20 PM [ET]

A highly controversial wiretapping bill headed toward a conference showdown late Tuesday after the Senate passed a version giving legal immunity to phone companies that took part in President Bush’s terrorist surveillance program.

With a 68-29 vote that flatly contradicted the House on this key issue, the Senate passed White House-backed legislation updating the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). 19 Democrats sided with their GOP colleagues, including Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.). The legislation would grant retroactive immunity to carriers that participated in the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance program — which bypassed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court — as long as they show they had authorization from the federal government.

But a difficult conference could stall final passage of the bill, as lawmakers continue to argue over whether to shield the carriers from the 40 or so lawsuits they face relating to the program.

Differences between the Senate version and the House-passed FISA bill, which does not include the immunity provision, must be resolved by Friday, when a six-month-old interim FISA law expires.

Under pressure from the White House, Congress passed legislation last August that granted broad powers to the government to conduct warrantless surveillance, including on Americans, as long as the communication concerned a party reasonably believed to be abroad.

In a sign of the bumpy road ahead, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) wrote the White House Tuesday to reject the administration’s claim that the immunity is justified by secret documents it has shared with him and other select members of Congress.

“There is no basis for the broad telecommunications company amnesty provisions advocated by the administration and contained in the [Senate FISA] bill,” Conyers wrote White House Counsel Fred Fielding. “These materials raise more questions than they answer.”

But senators rejected a series of six amendments earlier Tuesday that would have reined in or strengthened oversight of the NSA program. They included amendments that would strip or revise the immunity protections, as well as language that would bolster the role of the FISA court, which has traditionally overseen foreign-intelligence gathering on U.S. soil.

The sole Democratic victory, adopted by voice vote, was an amendment by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) that would prevent the government from preserving any surveillance it accidentally collects on Americans in the course of targeting someone else.

Even if House and Senate negotiators can agree, final passage faces other obstacles. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) has threatened a filibuster if the final bill provides blanket immunity for the phone companies, while President Bush has threatened to veto any bill that does not.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) urged a quick conference with the House and said he doubted a conference was even necessary.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.