The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow GOP says war funding could resolve spending impasse
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
GOP says war funding could resolve spending impasse
Posted: 11/16/07 03:40 PM [ET]

Senate Republicans suggested Friday that the White House might warm to a Democratic proposal to ramp up domestic spending if interim funding for the Iraq war is added to the package.

With new Iraq funding stalled and Democrats trying to find a middle ground in the ongoing battle with the White House over domestic spending, Republicans say piecing the two plans together could produce a bipartisan deal. But Democrats reacted coolly to the suggestion.

Jon Kyl of Arizona, the chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, predicted that Republicans would be willing to “talk about some things” if Democrats offer an omnibus appropriations bill free of “pork-barrel” spending with several months’ worth of Iraq war funding and no conditions attached.

“Just ratcheting up the amount and then cutting it halfway is certainly not an answer,” Kyl told reporters before the Senate recessed for its two-week Thanksgiving break. Kyl was referring to a Democratic plan to “split the difference” between Congress’s and Bush’s budget levels for domestic spending.

Other Republicans on Friday echoed Kyl’s sentiment.

The Republican offer, however, is making little headway within the Democratic Conference. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said his “thoughts on compromising domestic spending [are] somewhat laughable.”

Reid said the president just signed into law a $460 billion Pentagon funding bill that can supply enough war funding until the end of February or the middle of March. He criticized Republicans for blocking on Friday $50 billion in additional war funding that also included a goal of withdrawing troops from Iraq by December 2008.

“We offered him some more money. He refused that,” Reid said. “So if [Republicans] want to follow the president over the cliff, then they’re welcome to do that.”

The comments came after the Senate refused Friday to take up two bills that would provide interim funding for the Iraq war. The $50 billion Democratic bill failed by a 53-45 vote, short of the 60 needed to proceed to debating the bill. The Republican alternative, which would provide $70 billion with no strings attached, received fewer votes than the Democratic alternative, failing 45-53 on a procedural vote.

When Congress returns in December, Democrats will float an omnibus funding bill that will likely package together 11 remaining spending bills and not include Iraq war funding, Democrats say.

In the omnibus bill, Democrats plan to propose an $11 billion increase above Bush’s request, a drop from the $22 billion boost they had been seeking for much of the year.

But the White House is strongly opposed to an increase over its proposal, promising a veto and raising doubts that a compromise can be reached when lawmakers return in December.

The White House and Republicans say Iraq war funding will be dried up in January. After the Friday votes, the GOP charged that Democrats were leaving Capitol Hill without approving necessary funds to help the country win the Iraq war.

“Our troops deserve this funding, they need it, and we call on Congress to deliver it as soon as possible,” said Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman
 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.