The Hill
Sunday, May 11, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Grassley questions Bear Stearns bailout
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Grassley questions Bear Stearns bailout
Posted: 03/20/08 04:47 PM [ET]
The Senate Finance Committee’s top Republican on Thursday questioned the Federal Reserve’s bailout of Bear Stearns and whether the action may have benefited top executives at the expense of shareholders.

“Corporate bigwigs shouldn’t be able to profit from a deal while employees, shareholders and creditors have to carry the burden of a company’s demise,” Sen. Charles Grassley (Iowa) said in a statement. He said he had asked staffers to “delve into the details” of the Bear Stearns buyout by JP Morgan Chase.

The Federal Reserve engineered the buyout, which JP Morgan agreed to after the Fed said it would assume $30 billion of risky Bear Stearns mortgage bonds. Bear Stearns would have filed for bankruptcy if the deal had not gone through, which the Fed worried would cause more serious problems for the U.S. economy.

Grassley stopped short of calling for hearings for the Federal Reserve’s actions. He also said he was not questioning the decision to prevent Bear Stearns from sliding into bankruptcy.

“My point is not that bankruptcy would’ve been the better course for Bear Stearns,” he said. “I’m looking at a slice of the consequences. The top executives shouldn’t be treated better than anyone else when a company goes under.”

He also said he wanted to understand what the downside risk of the deal is for taxpayers, as well as whether there could be “upside potential.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.