The Hill
Friday, July 03, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Green gladly sheds ethics panel burden
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Green gladly sheds ethics panel burden
Posted: 12/26/08 03:53 AM [ET]

Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas) has told Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that it is time for him to get rid of the uncomfortable job of policing his peers.

Green is the acting chairman of the ethics panel, appointed to the temporary post after former Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio) died in August. In a brief interview before members left for the winter recess, Green said his time on the panel is limited and he has no interest in continuing the thankless job.

 

“The Speaker and I have talked and I told her that I was ready to go,­ can’t get away fast enough, really,” he said.

House rules impose a three-term limit on ethics committee service, but that limit can and has been waived for the chair if the Speaker requests it.

“Very few people want to serve on the ethics committee, especially as chairman, so when they find someone willing to do it, they often keep them,” said Craig Holman, an ethics expert at Public Citizen.

Stan Brand, a Democratic ethics lawyer, said he remembers then-Rep. Louis Stokes’ (D-Ill.) angry reaction when he convinced then-Speaker Tip O’Neil (D-Mass.) to name him to chair the panel.

“Twenty minutes later I got a call from the floor because Stokes was trying to find me and he wasn’t happy,” Brand recalled.

Green said Pelosi has agreed to let him leave the committee, even though the timing may put her in an awkward position. The panel will face a mass exodus in January and is in the middle of investigating Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.).

Democratic Reps. Lucille Roybal Allard (Calif.) and Mike Doyle (Pa.), who also have served their three terms, are expected to depart. Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), who was tapped to replace Tubbs Jones, also said he too does not expect to remain on the committee.

Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.), who joined the committee last year, is the only Democratic member without a term-limits excuse to leave the panel. For that reason, Democratic sources said, he is the most likely to be tasked with wielding the gavel.

On the Republican side, Rep. Doc Hastings (Wash.) must leave the ranking spot after winning the top GOP position on the Natural Resources Committee after Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) was forced out earlier this month. The other Republicans on the panel, Reps. Jo Bonner (Ala.), Gresham Barrett (S.C.), John Kline (Minn.) and Michael McCaul (Texas), were newly named to the committee this Congress and are expected to stay on.

The mad dash out off the panel will take place at the end of this Congress in early January, the same time Pelosi said she expects the ethics panel to wrap up its investigation in the allegations piling up around Rangel.

The comment got Pelosi into some hot water with Republicans because the ethics committee’s activities are supposed to be secret and completely free from even the appearance of any outside interference.

Since her comments, the panel has expanded its Rangel probe to include new allegations.

If Delahunt is named chair, Pelosi must find other Democrats she can strong-arm into serving on the panel, which will continue to review any new allegations against Rangel, or the existing charges if the current committee does not finish its work and issue an initial report on its findings. Any choice Pelosi makes will be analyzed for any Rangel implications. If the member is African-American, that could be viewed as an attempt to help Rangel, even if Pelosi tries to sell it as a way to fill Tubbs Jones’ old post with another African American.

“This puts the Speaker in a very awkward position,” said Holman. “She does not want to get in the middle of defending or attacking Rangel.”

Brand suggested Rep. Mike Capuano, the straight-talking Democrat from Massachusetts who led the creation of Pelosi’s unpopular new Outside Ethics Office, which will provide some type of independent review to a tarnished ethics process. But even as he was doing it, Brand apologized for mentioning his Capuano’s name.

“He just struck me as someone who had the right sensibility and the right demeanor for the job ­ a solid, institutional person who doesn’t take it personally when he gets criticized from both ends of the political spectrum,” Brand said.

Capuano spokesman Allison Mills was tight-lipped on the topic.

“That’s not a rumor we have not heard,” she said.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.