The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow House passes omnibus spending bill
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
House passes omnibus spending bill
Posted: 12/17/07 11:41 PM [ET]

The House passed its omnibus spending bill Monday night in two separate votes.

The lower chamber first voted 253-154 to clear the omnibus spending measure and then voted 206-201 to add $31 billion for troops in Afghanistan.

In the first vote, 41 Republicans supported the measure while 8 Democrats voted no. Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.) voted present. While some GOP appropriators voted yes, House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) opposed the spending bill.

The Afghanistan measure attracted 18 Democratic no votes and the backing of five Republicans.

Republicans attacked the omnibus package, pointing out that many earmarks were “airdropped” into the bill at the last moment. They also were critical of Democratic leadership’s decision not to include Iraq war funding in the measure. Those funds are expected to be added by the Senate.

Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), a vocal critic of earmarks, said a few of the airdropped earmarks simply seek to allocate money to cities without explanation.

Flake rattled off the names of cities and how much the bill will allocate to those locales.

“For what?” Flake asked. “We have no idea.”

In his closing remarks, House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) called the bill “the major domestic achievement of the Congress for the year,” but called the measure inadequate. He blamed President Bush and the Senate for forcing the bill to be scaled back.

Obey said there were two messages that voters sent in November 2006: end the war in Iraq and change the nation’s priorities.

“We’ve struggled mightily to bring about both,” Obey said. “We’ve failed because of two reasons: not enough votes in the Senate” and the president’s decision not to compromise with the Democratic-led Congress.

Obey explained Democrats have 51 votes in the upper chamber and that the Senate’s “peculiar” rules call for controversial bills to attract 60 votes.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.