The Hill
Friday, January 09, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Jefferson’s attorneys ask for change of venue
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Jefferson’s attorneys ask for change of venue
Posted: 09/07/07 05:13 PM [ET]
Lawyers for Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) Friday asked a federal judge to throw out the bribery charges against him and to change the venue from Northern Virginia to Washington, D.C.

The requests came amid a flurry of 14 motions Jefferson’s legal team filed with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

In arguing for a change of venue, Jefferson’s lawyers maintain that D.C. is the “center of gravity” of the entire case, and that therefore it is the place where it should be tried. They also accused prosecutors of purposely choosing Northern Virginia over D.C. in an attempt to convene a jury with fewer minority members. The prosecutors asked the judge to order the Justice Department and the FBI to produce all of its internal memos concerning the choice of where to bring the indictment to ensure that race was not part of the decision.

The lawyers also repeated their argument that the bribery charges should be thrown out because Jefferson did not exchange something of value for an “official act,” as the bribery statute dictates.

“The indictment does not charge that Mr. Jefferson obtained any earmarks or appropriations, or that he worked to pass any legislation for the companies involved — the government only charges that he ‘used his position to promote business in which he had an interest,’” the lawyers wrote.

The legal team also maintained that the FBI took some documents it was not entitled to during its raid on Jefferson’s home and that the conspiracy, wire-fraud and other charges should be dismissed.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.