The Hill
Thursday, May 15, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Lawmakers from caucus states roiled over Clinton criticism
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Lawmakers from caucus states roiled over Clinton criticism
Posted: 03/25/08 06:53 PM [ET]

Democratic lawmakers from caucus states are agitated by the Clinton campaign’s attempts to dismiss Sen. Barack Obama’s (Ill.) victories in their home states.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and her campaign surrogates have tried to marginalize Obama’s caucus wins by saying the process is unfair because it limits participation. In a televised interview earlier this month, Pennsylvania Gov. Edward Rendell (D), a top Clinton supporter, went as far as to call the caucus process “undemocratic.”

In interviews, a host of superdelegates supportive of the caucus system pushed back against that criticism, and said the attacks reflect hardball tactics by a Clinton campaign trying to diminish Obama’s overwhelming success in caucus states.

Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), an uncommitted superdelegate whose state and district were won by Obama, said the Clinton campaign’s attack on the caucus system is a “cause for concern” in evaluating her candidacy and one of a number of factors he’ll consider in making his endorsement.

He said his home state’s January caucuses “were one of the most democratic processes we’ve ever seen.”

“If you had seen what I saw in my precinct caucus, and the overwhelming number of first-time caucus attendees, including my two older children, I think that it would put to rest all of this nonsense about caucuses being an undemocratic process,” Braley said.

Braley’s concerns were echoed by superdelegates from Washington state, where Obama also won.

“The first thing I would say to any national leader, whoever they are, is, ‘Don’t boss around states and tell them how to select their delegates,’ ” said Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), who, like Braley, has not picked a candidate to support in the race.

The attacks by the Clinton campaign, which makes the pitch that she is the most electable Democratic candidate because of her success in large states with primaries, risks alienating lawmakers and other superdelegates who are expected to determine the outcome of the nomination battle.

Neither Obama nor Clinton is likely to clinch the nomination after the last primaries are held in early June, so the candidates are taking their case directly to 795 superdelegates — the members of Congress, governors, Democratic National Committee members and other local officials whose backing might determine the outcome of the race. At least 50, or more than 15 percent, of the uncommitted superdelegates come from the 13 states that hold caucuses.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.