The Hill
Sunday, October 12, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow McConnell feels the heat on earmarks
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
McConnell feels the heat on earmarks


“I think most people realize the earmark task force was not a serious effort to fix the problem,” said a GOP aide. “It was simply a way for our leader to kick the can down the road and give Republicans cover to oppose the earmark moratorium.

“We now have the task force’s recommendations, but even its mild reforms are being slow-walked,” said the aide. “It’s becoming increasingly clear that he may not be capable of leading Republicans on spending, which is absolutely critical to regaining trust with voters.”

Critics of earmarks disagree with several of McConnell’s decisions. Specifically, they question his putting Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), who secured more earmarks in 2007 than any other lawmaker, and Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), an outspoken opponent of earmarks, on the task force and requiring the ad hoc panel to agree unanimously before proposing any reforms.

“It means there’s going to be a narrow field of things they agree on,” said Steve Ellis, vice president at Taxpayers for Common Sense. “Cochran and Coburn don’t agree on much in this area, so whatever they agree on is going to be small.”

Despite the criticism, Coburn has voiced support for the panel’s work.

“I’m very pleased to be a part of this group,” Coburn said when the task force announced its findings in April. “I would have wanted more, but we came to a compromise, and I think it’s a great compromise.”

Conservative critics also question why McConnell did not ask the task force to report its recommendations before the Senate debated the budget, when Republicans would have had a chance to force votes on various fiscal reforms.

If Senate Republicans do not adopt earmark reform unilaterally, it may put them at odds with their party’s presumptive nominee.

“I think Sen. McCain is going to make this one of the hallmarks of his campaign and he may end up running against the entire Congress on spending — and I say, more power to him,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).

Several senior members of the Republican Conference remain staunchly opposed to the earmark reform. The inclusion of Cochran on Lugar’s task force did little to mollify critics.

“I think the attempt to change the earmark problem right now would just fail; it’s a waste of time in a presidential election year when it’s just one of the pin-up children of people who want headlines,” said Sen. Ted Stevens (Alaska), the Senate’s most senior Republican and a member of the Appropriations Committee.  

“I think we ought to just get a copy of the Constitution and give it to every one of them and see if they can read it all the way through. They would then understand earmarks.”

Other Republicans recognize it’s a divisive issue in the conference and declined to say whether McConnell should move forward without the Democrats.

“I don’t want to get in the middle of it,” said Senate Republican Conference Chairman Jon Kyl (Ariz.).

McConnell said Tuesday that he is still negotiating with Reid over earmark reform.

“I’m hopeful that we’ll be able to reach some understanding,” he said.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.