The Hill
Sunday, October 12, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Members squabble over ‘global war on terror’
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Members squabble over ‘global war on terror’
Posted: 04/04/07 03:57 PM [ET]
Democrats and Republicans sparred over the use of the term “global war on terror” Wednesday, after the GOP claimed the majority party was seeking to ban the phrase.

“The attempt by Democrats to erase the words ‘global’ and ‘terror’ from our current war is an absurd effort to deny the fact that America is battling terrorism on a global scale,” House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said. “How do Democrats expect America to fight and win a war they deny is even taking place?”

The Military Times had reported that Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee want to keep the term out of the 2008 defense budget because the panel’s “Democratic leadership does not like the phrase.”

Committee chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) called the debate a “tempest in a teapot” and countered by saying, “GOP objections to our efforts to clarify legislative language represent the typical Republican leadership attempt to tie together the misadventure in Iraq and the overall war against terrorists.”

Skelton contended that the war in Iraq “is separate and distinct from the war against terrorists, who have their genesis in Afghanistan and who attacked us on 9/11, and the American people understand this.”

Boehner, however, said the battle of semantics is just the latest example of the Democrats’ “dismal record on matters affecting our national security.”

“It’s no wonder Democrats don’t like the phrase ‘global war on terror’: They have completely failed to take the threat of global terrorism seriously,” he said.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.