The Hill
Sunday, July 06, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Miers won’t testify
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Miers won’t testify
Posted: 07/11/07 05:13 PM [ET]

Former White House counsel Harriet Miers will not appear Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, her attorney said, pointing to a directive from the White House that says she should disobey a subpoena from the panel.

In a letter made available Wednesday, Miers’s attorney George Manning informed House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) and House Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee Chairwoman Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) that White Counsel Fred Fielding has instructed him that Miers’s testimony is protected under executive privilege and that she therefore does not need to appear at the hearing.

Fielding’s letter to Manning, which Manning also submitted to Conyers and Sanchez, stated that the Department of Justice (DoJ) confirmed that Miers has “absolute immunity from compelled congressional testimony as to matters occurring while she was a senior advisor to the president.”

The letter also cited a 1999 opinion by former Attorney General Janet Reno stating that “subjecting a senior presidential advisor to the congressional subpoena power would be akin to requiring the president himself to appear before Congress on matters relating to his constitutionally assigned functions.”

Sanchez said Wednesday it is “disappointing” that Bush asserted executive privilege and noted that the White House had previously offered, with several restrictions, to make Miers available to the committee.

“The White House had previously offered to allow Ms. Miers to talk with our committee — without an oath or transcription — so I presume that her testimony is not a grave threat to the health of the executive branch,” she said.

Sanchez and Conyers also pointed out that former White House political director Sara Taylor testified Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee despite the president asserting executive privilege over specific aspects of her testimony. While Taylor refused to answer some questions, citing executive privilege, she nevertheless answered other questions, Sanchez and Conyers noted.

Conyers and Sanchez wasted little time in criticizing the White House decision, sending a letter to Fielding Wednesday questioning the counsel’s justifications for asserting executive privilege.

“We are aware of absolutely no court decision that supports the notion that a former White House official has the option of refusing to even appear in response to a Congressional subpoena,” they wrote, “To the contrary, the courts have made clear that no present or former government official — even the president — is above the law and may completely disregard a legal directive such as the Committee’s subpoena.

 “A refusal to appear before the Subcommittee tomorrow could subject Ms. Miers to contempt proceedings,” including being held under contempt of Congress, they added.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.