The Hill
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Obey criticizes Kingston on earmarks
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Obey criticizes Kingston on earmarks
Posted: 03/06/08 06:31 PM [ET]

A House Republican leading efforts to reform the earmarking process has come under fire from House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) for privately telling him he supports earmarks.

Obey said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), who has sponsored legislation that would ban earmarks this year, privately told him he was in favor of earmarks.

“You know, David, I am really for earmarks,” Obey said Kingston told him.

“I said, ‘Yes, Jack, I do know,’” said Obey, who added that Kingston made numerous requests for earmarks last year to the appropriations panel.

Kingston confirmed the conversation, but said it reflected his beliefs about reforming the appropriations process.

“What I have told David privately and what I have said publicly is the same thing. I have been very upfront,” said Kingston in a phone interview with The Hill.

Kingston said Obey has been “very irritated” with his push for reform. “I don’t understand why it has generated so much criticism from David because he has been critical of Republicans earmarking so much,” he said.

Kingston said he supports Congress’s prerogative to earmark and has supported worthy projects for his district. But the thirst for lawmakers’ pet projects has gotten out of control and needs to be reined in, he said.

“Earmarks got out of control on Republican watch. I think it is truly one of the reasons why we lost the majority,” said Kingston.

The eight-term Republican sponsored earmarks worth roughly $100 million either by himself or with other lawmakers, according to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group. Kingston’s earmark total was the 13th-highest of all House members for the 2008 appropriations bills.

Obey’s comments come on the heels of a letter he sent to lawmakers Wednesday that asked them to check one box if they planned to continue to make earmark requests this year or a second if they would not.

“It is the hypocrisy antidote,” Obey said.

Kingston, along with Reps. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) and Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.), have authored a resolution that would ban the projects this year and establish a bipartisan, bicameral panel to study and fix the earmarking process. The bill currently has 158 cosponsors and has served as a model for the Republicans’ new earmark standards.

Obey has expressed frustration with the projects as well. “I have never been for earmarks but I have always accepted them as a member of the House,” said the House Appropriations chairman.

No Republicans have responded to the Obey letter, according to Kirstin Brost, a spokeswoman for the committee.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.