The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Reid: 'No expectation' of compromise on housing bill
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Reid: 'No expectation' of compromise on housing bill
Posted: 02/27/08 01:05 PM [ET]

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday said he has no hope of a compromise with the White House over a housing bill that has provoked a veto threat, as fellow Democratic senators wrestled with whether to remove controversial bankruptcy law changes to attract Republican support.

"I have no expectation of reaching any agreement with the White House," Reid told reporters during a press conference with Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.).

"I have tried for seven years ... So we're going to do what we think is best for the country. If we get 67 votes, that's great. If not, the president is going to have to veto this legislation."

The White House issued a veto threat late Tuesday, and Reid said he doubted the Bush administration would compromise.

Reid said he has reached out to Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to forge a compromise, but balked at the possibility of removing the bankruptcy provisions from the bill. The banking industry strongly opposes those provisions, and many Republicans oppose them as well. Democrats argue the provisions would help homeowners facing foreclosure.

Stabenow, however, didn't shut the door quite so strongly to the possibility of dropping the bankruptcy provisions, especially if doing so becomes necessary to get the rest of the bill approved.

"I just don't know," she said when asked about dropping the language. "We support that provision. It is a very important piece of this."

Stabenow also said some Republicans have indicated they will cross over and support the legislation with the bankruptcy law changes, although she declined to name them.

She also emphasized that Democrats will insist as much as possible on keeping the bankruptcy components in the bill, since they would affect far more Americans than the White House's own proposal to reform the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and regulatory oversight of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

The bankruptcy changes in the housing bill would allow bankruptcy judges to rewrite the terms of mortgage loans on primary residences. Supporters say the change could help as many as 600,000 homeowners avoid foreclosure, but the banking industry has said that will increase instability and possibly interest rates. Likewise, the White House veto threat Tuesday argued that the bankruptcy law changes “would undermine existing contracts," among other harmful effects.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.