The Hill
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Reid: Spending bills will likely wait until Bush is gone
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Reid: Spending bills will likely wait until Bush is gone
Posted: 07/10/08 02:12 PM [ET]

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Thursday he expects Congress will not pass any annual spending bills this year, saying lawmakers will likely postpone that responsibility until President Bush is out of office.

“I anticipate we will do a continuing resolution to get us until Sen. [Barack] Obama becomes president,” Reid said, referring to the Illinois senator and Democratic presidential candidate.

Reid’s statement, while not unexpected, adds a note of finality to speculation that the Senate would act on the 12 annual appropriation bills. He also said that he doesn’t expect Congress to return for a post-election, lame-duck session. Under that scenario, Congress would only be in session for another six weeks this year.

Reid left some wiggle room to make a deal on funding for the Pentagon and military construction, but even those could slip until next year, he said. For the other bills, he said, “we’ll just have to wait and see.”

Democrats have little incentive to try to approve more than $1 trillion of domestic discretionary spending this year. They are expected to expand their majority in Congress, and if Obama wins the White House, they will be better positioned to dictate how to spend federal dollars. Plus, pushing the bills through could expose members to politically sensitive amendments on taxes and spending on the eve of the November election.

But holding off on Congress’s fundamental responsibility would almost certainly open Democrats up to attacks of not doing their basic job.

The White House has threatened to veto any bills over Bush’s limit, which is about $21 billion less than what Democrats have proposed. Last year, Democrats caved to Bush’s demands after a protracted fight.

Manu Raju contributed to this article.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.