The Hill
Monday, December 01, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Review of contested election advances
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Review of contested election advances
Posted: 06/15/07 07:12 PM [ET]
The task force assigned to examine the contested election in Florida’s 13th district voted unanimously yesterday to move forward with a review plan crafted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and set a target completion date of July 27.

After some testy exchanges over the extent to which Republicans are involved in the process, Chairman Charles Gonzalez (D-Texas) and panel members Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) all voted in favor of the plan, which could lead to further testing of the voting machines in Sarasota County.

Democrat Christine Jennings is contesting her loss to Rep. Vern Buchanan (R) in November’s election. She lost by 369 votes and contends that voting machine malfunctions in Sarasota County caused her defeat.

The panel, formed in March, assigned the GAO to conduct a review of the election after the case stalled in Florida courts.

The GAO’s objective is described in the plan as to discover “to what extent could the voting machines have contributed to the large undervote” — 18,000 Sarasota County ballots did not include a vote in the race — and to decide whether extra testing is necessary.

The GAO’s approach involves answering three questions in addition to that one: what voting equipment was used and how it was used, what is the scope of the undervote, and what reviews were conducted before the election.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.