The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Rules revolt, ethics fiasco
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Rules revolt, ethics fiasco
Posted: 02/27/08 08:03 PM [ET]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) efforts to bring about a new day on House ethics appeared to collapse Wednesday, with Democrats on a key committee openly rebelling against an ethics measure backed by leadership.

Members of the Rules Committee, who rarely break with their leaders, expressed deep dismay during a hearing Wednesday over a proposal to create an outside ethics office to judge complaints about members, and their opposition forced leaders to cancel an expected floor vote on the bill Thursday.

One Democrat on the committee, Rep. Dennis Cardoza (Calif.)  used the word “suck” to describe his feelings for the Democratic bill, as well as a GOP alternative unveiled Wednesday.

“That’s a Rules Committee term of art,” Slaughter interjected.

“It’s a term of frustration,” Cardoza countered.

Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.), the panel’s ranking member, said he hadn’t seen a committee meeting so far this Congress in which both sides were dissenting against a Democratic leadership backed resolution with such a “thoughtful discussion.”

Only one Democrat on the committee, freshman Rep. Kathy Castor (Fla.), appeared willing to support the proposal. Others, including Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (N.Y.), spoke out forcefully against it, saying it would spawn partisan witch-hunts and a return to the open ethics warfare of the past.

“I am having a real problem understanding why six people from outside this place will be smarter, more ethical than we are,” Slaughter said, referencing the fact that the proposed task force would not include members of Congress.

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) also made a rare appearance to speak out against the Democratic proposal, which had been spearheaded by an ethics task force headed by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.). Boehner called on members to endorse the  GOP substitute.

Boehner said earlier this week he had begged Pelosi not to bring the Democratic bill up for a vote — to no avail.

“We should fix the ethics committee – not layer on top of it a new bureaucracy that stands between members of Congress and entities such as the Department of Justice and the FBI, the gold standard of law enforcement,” he said.

In response to the outcry, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) late Wednesday afternoon announced on the House floor that Democratic leaders were postponing the vote to allow their members time to consider the GOP substitute or any alternative other members wanted to offer.

“We had scheduled for tomorrow a rule which would have established a process of access and oversight that many believed would be an improvement,” Hoyer said. “Mr. [Lamar] Smith [R-Texas] brought a new proposal, which we had not seen, to the Rules Committee. We have asked Mr. Capuano about that proposal and he has indicated that he wants an opportunity to review it.”

Hoyer added that the House would consider the resolution soon, but not Thursday.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.