The Hill
Monday, October 06, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Senators introduce legislation to give D.C. voting member of House
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Senators introduce legislation to give D.C. voting member of House
Posted: 05/01/07 08:13 PM [ET]
Legislation that would give the District of Columbia a voting member of the House and Utah an at-large seat was introduced in the Senate yesterday.

Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) sponsored the bill, which the House passed 241-177 on April 19.
  The Senate version does not contain pay-as-you-go language, repeals the D.C. delegate position once there is a representative and requires Utah to redistrict before the 2008 election, rather than after the 2010 census, as the House bill stipulates.

The at-large requirement in the House bill was unconstitutional and “too heavy-handed” because it “denies [Utahans] their right to redistrict how they see fit,” Hatch said in a statement.

Hatch also said that he spoke with House sponsors Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) and Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) about the constitutionality of the bill.

“In many respects Congress has treated the District as a state for many years: District residents pay federal taxes and laws that apply to states apply to the District as well,” Hatch said. “These arguments lead me to believe it is only fair that we proceed with this legislation and, if it becomes necessary, let the courts decide.”

But the bill’s fate remains uncertain, as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has hinted that there could be a filibuster on the bill. He said that he would support a constitutional amendment for statehood instead.

“This measure, if it is worth pursuing, ought to be pursued in a legal and appropriate way,” McConnell said in a press conference yesterday. “And amending the Constitution is clear[ly] and unambiguously the way to do it.”
The legislation has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee.
 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.