The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Study would examine Iraq troop withdrawals
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Study would examine Iraq troop withdrawals


The outcome of the study would not be binding, but could serve as ammunition for Democrats who have been trying, unsuccessfully, to pass legislation that would force the current administration to redeploy the military from Iraq.

It also could put pressure on the Pentagon to accelerate its plans on withdrawing troops. Lawmakers have doubts about the status of Pentagon’s formal planning with regards to taking troops out of Iraq.

McCain has warned that pulling troops from Iraq too quickly could set back security gains made since the “surge” of troops in 2007. He argues Obama would pull U.S. troops out of Iraq at a time when victory for the U.S. is within reach.

Since winning majorities in 2006, Democrats in the House and Senate have been unable to move legislation on a troop withdrawal, and the $612 billion defense-spending bill does not call for troops to be removed.

Fights over Iraq dominated the Congress in 2007, but Democrats this year backed away from an election-season showdown over Iraq with President Bush.

In testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Sept. 23, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that the United States has entered “the endgame” in Iraq. But Gates has opposed any congressional efforts to set a timetable for withdrawing troops, or requiring troop reduction.

Gates also told the panel that the greatest threat to the United States comes from tribal lands in Pakistan along the border with Afghanistan, not Iraq. But he cautioned that withdrawing more troops from Iraq, where violence has declined by 80 percent since the surge, has to be done carefully.

Bush in early September said that he would not withdraw a significant number of troops from Iraq after Gen. David Petraeus, the former top U.S. commander in Iraq and now the head of Central Command, advised him against it. Bush announced a withdrawal of 8,000 troops by February. Additionally, about 30,000 combat troops that were part of the so-called surge strategy in Iraq in 2007 have returned home.

Petraeus argued that the security gains achieved with the extra troops could be at risk in the event of another significant withdrawal.

There are currently about 146,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.