The Hill
Saturday, July 05, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Superdelegates say, we will decide
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Superdelegates say, we will decide


A few Democrats echo party leaders, who have called on superdelegates to sustain the will of primary voters. But even superdelegates who say the delegate count will be decisive in their own decision-making add a caveat: They warn that the delegate count will be less important if the leading candidate has not also won a majority of the popular vote.

“For me it will be a combination of delegate lead and the popular vote,” said Rep. Jason Altmire, a neutral Democrat from Pennsylvania. “If Clinton catches Obama in the popular vote, that’s important.

“I don’t want to be looked at as overturning the popular vote,” Altmire added.

Altmire is in the minority among undeclared superdelegates. Only three other superdelegates interviewed agreed with him. By contrast, 34 superdelegates said the delegate lead would not be decisive. Four Democratic lawmakers declined to comment.

“I’m looking for the candidate with the greatest support from those who participated in the primaries, the candidate who has the most momentum going forward and who has the best chance to win in November,” said Sen. Ben Cardin (Md.).

Pelosi warned colleagues soon after Super Tuesday, Feb. 5, that they should be careful about overturning a candidate’s delegate lead at the August convention in Denver.

“I don’t think it was ever intended that superdelegates would overturn the verdict, the decision of the American people,” she said. “What they are there to do is to be in place should there be a need for some change in what happens, but not to change what happened in the election.”

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said Tuesday that superdelegates should choose against the delegate leader only if he or she commits a gaffe so extreme that it would seriously jeopardize the party’s chances in the fall.

Some Democratic strategists fear that if Obama leads in delegates and popular votes after June 4 and party officials decide to give the nomination to Clinton, it would anger many black voters. They warn that significant numbers of black voters could stay home in the fall, hurting Democrats in congressional races around the country.

“We should not overturn the decision of pledged delegates unless something comes up before the convention that makes it clear the leading candidate is unelectable,” said Van Hollen. “There would have to be a clear consensus that person is unelectable.”

But few other neutral Democrats agree with Van Hollen, even though they have tasked him with the job of protecting their majority status in this fall’s elections.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.