The Hill
Sunday, September 07, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Supreme Court shoots down D.C. gun ban
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Supreme Court shoots down D.C. gun ban
Posted: 06/26/08 10:20 AM [ET]

The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down Washington D.C.’s ban on handguns, ruling the restrictions infringe on the Second Amendment.

The 5-4 decision handed down Thursday is the Supreme Court’s first major Second Amendment ruling in nearly 70 years. It declared unconstitutional a D.C. law on the books for more than 30 years.

Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy agreeing.  

Justices David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer and John Paul Stevens dissented.

The District since 1976 has restricted handgun ownership to former or current law enforcement officers who registered their guns before 1977. The law permits shotguns and hunting rifles in homes but requires them to be kept unloaded and either disassembled or fitted with a trigger lock.

Scalia’s opinion said these restrictions made it impossible for D.C. residents to use guns for self-defense and were a violation of the Second Amendment.
 
“The requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional,” Scalia wrote  in the 64-page majority opinion.

Scalia’s opinion said the Second Amendment protects individual gun owners and is not limited to militias. Supporters of the D.C. law had argued the right to bear arms was only meant for militias.

“The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self- defense within a home,” Scalia wrote.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled D.C.’s gun ban unconstitutional last year. Dissatisfied with the ruling, lawyers for the District appealed the decision, and in November the Supreme Court agreed to consider the case. Arguments were heard in March.

Dozens of lawmakers in almost every Congress have put forward amendments and bills to revoke the D.C. gun ban, all of which have failed.

D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty and other supporters of the ban have argued that restricting gun ownership is a necessary tactic to battle gun violence in the city. 

This story was updated at 11:22 a.m.
 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.