The Hill
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow Waxman: White House censored climate scientists
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
Waxman: White House censored climate scientists
Posted: 12/10/07 11:44 AM [ET]
A new report from a House committee said Monday that the White House has engaged in a “systematic” effort to “censor climate scientists.”

According to the report, compiled for House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the Bush administration has sought to restrict media access to government scientists and has also edited congressional testimony.

“The evidence before the committee leads to one inescapable conclusion: The Bush administration has engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate climate change science and mislead policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming,” according to the document.

The report, written by the Democratic committee staff, also asserts that the Bush administration’s actions seeking to muddy the waters on climate change could come straight out of the oil industry’s playbook.

Panel Republicans strongly objected to the findings and lamented that an inquiry that had begun as a bipartisan fact-finding mission had been turned into a political document.

“The majority has relied on selective passages from two hearings, one deposition, and one transcribed interview to make grossly exaggerated claims of political interference with climate change science,” according to the minority response.

“The majority report is filled with evidence of deep animus toward the Bush administration, animus that ultimately and unfortunately colors the conclusions,” the GOP response states. “From the disregard of available evidence to the failure to investigate those matters that already fit neatly into the majority’s views, the report is biased and incomplete.”

The Democratic staff said there is evidence that the White House sought to control the access of the media to some government climate scientists. In addition, the White House also edited congressional testimony and climate change reports.

However, Republicans responded that such changes were not as significant as the Democrats are charging and that the majority “appears not to understand the interagency review process.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.