The Hill
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow White House asserts executive privilege on Cheney
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
White House asserts executive privilege on Cheney
Posted: 07/16/08 12:30 PM [ET]

The White House asserted executive privilege Wednesday and refused to turn over FBI reports of its interviews with Vice President Dick Cheney on the leaking of a covert CIA operative’s identity to the media.

As a result, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held off on a previously scheduled vote to hold Attorney General Michael Mukasey in contempt.

“Rather than go to a vote on contempt, I thought we ought to have to step back, have a look at his arguments, evaluate them, and want to talk to Ranking Member [Tom] Davis and other members of the committee to decide what our next step will be,” Waxman said. “But we’re not going to end it today.  We’re going to move forward.  We are not going to accept this answer that he’s given to us.”

In a letter dated Wednesday to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the panel’s chairman, a deputy assistant attorney general said Mukasey had advised Bush to assert executive privilege on the FBI interview reports on Cheney.

The letter noted that Justice has permitted the panel’s staff to look at FBI reports, with limited redactions, of interviews agents conducted with senior White House staff.

“We are not prepared to make the same accommodation for reports of interviews with the president and vice president because the confidentiality interest relating to those documents are of a greater constitutional magnitude,” wrote Keith Nelson, principle deputy assistant attorney general.

“We are disappointed by the committee’s actions given our ooperation,” Nelson wrote of the scheduled contempt vote.

At issue are reports on interviews the FBI conducted with Vice President Cheney during its investigation of who leaked former CIA agent Valerie Plame’s name to the media.

Waxman had argued his committee could not pursue its own investigation into the leaking of Plame’s name without the Cheney documents. He had imposed a July 16 deadline for Justice to comply with a subpoena for the documents, or for Justice to assert executive rivilege.

Waxman previously has said he does not believe the privilege could apply to the Cheney interview documents.

“It is now clear that the vice president knew when the interview was conducted that its contents could be made public in a criminal trial,” he said in the July 8 letter, adding that “executive privilege cannot be asserted over the contents of communications voluntarily disclosed outside the White House.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.