The Hill
Sunday, November 23, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow White House questions McClellan's involvement
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
White House questions McClellan's involvement
Posted: 05/30/08 10:31 AM [ET]

The White House on Friday questioned whether former Press Secretary Scott McClellan was “in the loop” to make charges that have sparked a new round of questions about President Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, who was once McClellan's deputy, implied that McClellan would have missed key policy discussions because at the time of the run-up to the war, he had a different “portfolio.”

“It has been my experience as press secretary, you can be as in or out of the loop as you choose to be,” Perino said. She added: “I can walk in and see the president whenever I want.”

Perino, who like other current and former White House aides has described McClellan’s tell-all book as both “hurtful” and “puzzling,” said she doesn't “remember him ever complaining about lack of access.”

The comments continue a heavy GOP push back against McCellan since his book “What Happened” was released this week. Perino said the White House is confused and hurt by the message as much as the messenger.

The White House continued to deny what it sees as the central tenet of McClellan's book, that Bush invaded Iraq on false premises. Perino noted that intelligence at the time was accepted by several countries, and McClellan wrote his book with the benefit of “hindsight.”

“The reason he didn't object at the time was because there was nothing to object to,” she said, adding later, “It's his right to change his mind after the fact.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.