The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow White House rejects spending bill, sight unseen
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
White House rejects spending bill, sight unseen
Posted: 12/08/07 04:11 PM [ET]

The White House responded sharply on Saturday to reports that the congressional Democratic leadership was putting the finishing touches on a huge omnibus spending bill that includes funding for the ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Office of Management and Budget Director Jim Nussle issued a blunt veto threat and lambasted Democratic lawmakers for assembling the massive appropriations bill more than two months after the end of the fiscal year.

“If presented a bill like the one described in today’s press reports, the President would veto it,” Nussle said.

The measure would provide roughly $500 billion in federal government spending, including about $50 billion for the wars, according to press reports.

“Although the Administration has not seen the legislation, according to press reports it would include $18 billion in additional domestic and emergency spending above the president’s budget,” Nussle said. “When added to emergency domestic spending Congress already included in the Defense Appropriations bill, this so-called compromise would result in more excess spending than even the Democrats’ original budget included.”

In a joint statement, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) blasted the White House statement.

Although he admits he has not even seen the bipartisan legislation that would fund critical priorities such as border security, homeland security, and putting more police officers on the street, the president has recklessly threatened to veto it,” the Democratic leaders said. “For a President already lacking in credibility, it is dangerous to issue veto threats based on press reports alone.”

Nussle indicated, however, that the administration does not want the continuing showdown over federal spending to result in a government shutdown as the winter holidays approach and urged Congress to pass another continuing resolution to keep the government open and maintain Pentagon and war spending.

This categorical rejection by the White House of the potential omnibus bill comes as Democrats are trying to get GOP support for their spending proposal. In addition to criticism from the White House, Democrats also can be expected to be called out by their liberal base for not tying the Iraq war funds to efforts to being U.S. soldiers home.

The House plans to leave for the year by the end of the coming week, while the Senate is expected to remain in session for an additional week.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.