The Hill
Sunday, November 23, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow White House remains defiant on Miers, Bolten testimony
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
White House remains defiant on Miers, Bolten testimony
Posted: 08/07/08 05:34 PM [ET]

Despite a court ruling last week rejecting its claim of executive privilege, the White House still rebuffs congressional subpoenas for chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former counsel Harriet Miers.

The two on Thursday requested that federal District Judge John Bates stay the ruling until the case is appealed. In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), White House counsel Fred Fielding said the administration would await the outcome of its appeal before “entertaining any requests for Mr. Bolten’s compliance with the Senate Judiciary subpoena.”

Fielding also noted that any request for testimony from former White House adviser Karl Rove would produce the same response.

Leahy had sent a letter to Fielding last week asking him to advise the committee when Bolten would comply with the subpoena in light of the judge’s ruling.

Bates, in his decision, rejected the Bush administration’s claim that White House aides have blanket immunity from congressional subpoenas and ordered Miers to testify and the White House to turn over a log describing documents it withheld from Congress. 

The subpoenas sought testimony about what role, if any, senior White House officials played in the firings of nine U.S. attorneys last year, as well as the improper political hirings of attorneys and interns at the Department of Justice.

Leahy blasted the White House’s ongoing resistance to the subpoena, saying that it was yet another example of the Bush administration flouting the rule of law.

“This continuing contempt of Congress is another example of the lengths to which this administration will go and how it uses government lawyers to protect its actions from scrutiny and increase its power, rather than respect the rule of law,” he said in a statement. 

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.