The Hill
Sunday, November 23, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow White House says Bush would veto latest Iraq bill
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
White House says Bush would veto latest Iraq bill
Posted: 11/14/07 03:04 PM [ET]

The White House said Wednesday that President Bush would veto the latest effort of congressional Democrats to force the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

The House of Representatives is expected to vote Wednesday night on a $50 billion spending measure to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that also includes a goal for a specific date to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq.

“Once again, the Democratic leadership is starting this debate with a flawed strategy, including a withdrawal date for Iraq, despite the gains our military has made over the past year, despite having dozens of similar votes in the past that have failed, and despite their pledge to support the troops,” White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters. “And once again, they plan to send the president a bill that they know he will veto. This is for political posturing and to appease radical groups.”

Earlier this year, Bush vetoed a $95 billion measure that included similar provisions. Under severe criticism from their base, Democrats were forced to strip those requirements from the legislation, which the president then signed into law.

But the spending bill that the House is expected to consider late Wednesday includes significant gains for liberal Democrats who want to force Bush’s hand to change his policy in Iraq.

The spending bill does not preclude the president from spending money to extend the war, but it does make it clear that the money is to be used to “plan and execute a safe and orderly redeployment of [troops] from Iraq.”

It allows Bush to use troops after Dec. 15, 2008, to protect the U.S. embassy and bases in Iraq, train the Iraqi Security Forces and engage in counterterrorism operations.

The bill makes it clear that Congress wants to end the war as “safely and quickly as possible.” It also prohibits the U.S. government from subjecting people in its custody to torture or treatment not authorized by the U.S. Army Field Manual.

“We all view this as a significant statement, a turning point,” Rep. James McGovern (D-Mass.) said. “This is the beginning of the end of the war in Iraq.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.