The Hill
Monday, May 12, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Leading The News arrow White House warns 100,000 jobs rely on Iraq bill passage
Leading The News PDF Print E-mail
White House warns 100,000 jobs rely on Iraq bill passage
Posted: 12/11/07 07:44 PM [ET]

The Bush administration is threatening to issue layoff notices this week to about 100,000 civilian defense department employees if Congress will not provide money for the Iraq war.

The move raises the political stakes by repeating a threat to disrupt the financial security of thousands of workers just before Christmas.

The financial brinksmanship comes as Congress prepares to release its omnibus spending bill, which Bush threatened to veto Saturday before its terms were known. It resembles a defense-focused version of the 1995 government shutdown, which left Washington with the lesson that Congress, not the president, bears the blame when government grinds to a halt.

Against that backdrop, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England wrote to congressional leaders Friday that the Army will run out of money in mid-February. The Marine Corps, he said, will run out in mid-March.

“The department will issue potential furlough information to about 100,000 affected civilian employees,” England wrote. “While these actions will be detrimental to the nation, there are no other viable alternatives without additional congressional funding. Your support in providing these needed funds would be greatly appreciated.”

A furlough is a short-term layoff. Workers could be brought back when funds again become available. England noted that the law requires a 45-day notice before workers can be furloughed.

England also met last Thursday at the Pentagon with representatives of unions that bargain for federal employees.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates is to appear Tuesday before the House Armed Services Committee, where he is likely to be asked about the layoff plans. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is to appear before the Senate Appropriations Committee to discuss the Iraq supplemental spending request.

Congress has already passed a $459 billion defense spending bill for fiscal 2008, but it has not passed any supplemental funding for the Iraq war. House Democrats passed a $50 billion measure to cover the costs of the war for four months. But they tied it to a December 2008 withdrawal, and Senate Republicans killed the measure.

President Bush is pushing Congress to pass the money without strings, saying the delay is depriving the military of badly needed money. The administration began warning of layoffs shortly before Thanksgiving, saying at the time that 200,000 civilian employees and contractors could be put out of work.

At the time, House Appropriations defense subcommittee Chairman John Murtha (D-Pa.) blasted the Pentagon’s warning, calling it a “political document.” Last week, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said he believed “the troops are funded right now” from the money provided in the defense appropriations bill.

In addition, Reps. Tom Davis (R-Va.), Frank Wolf (R-Va.) and a group of Washington-area Democratic representatives wrote to Gates, complaining that the Pentagon was not doing enough to avoid layoffs and layoff notices.

“We believe that the Army and DoD possess budgetary procedures and have statutory authority to avoid furloughs and termination of contracts well into 2008,” the lawmakers said.

Although Democratic leaders are complaining that the Republican administration is engaging in holiday season scare tactics, the federal employee unions are taking the threats seriously.

“I would hope, regardless of political affiliation, the leaders understand that people need income,” said Richard Brown, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees. “I would hope they would come to some resolution that doesn’t jeopardize the United States in the form of its federal employees.” 

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.