Sen. John McCainJohn McCainDrug importation won't save dollars or lives Dem rep Charlie Crist files for divorce Why the GOP cannot sweep its Milo scandal under the rug MORE (R-Ariz.) endorsed the
Pentagon’s bidding process for a $35 billion tanker contract as
“legitimate” on Tuesday and said he was not worried about Boeing, the
only competitor left for the contract.
McCain, who six years ago was instrumental in scuttling a $23.5 billon deal in which Boeing would have leased 100 tankers to the Air Force, said he would have liked Boeing to have competition for the bid.
McCain said he was disappointed that Northrop Grumman decided not compete, but said he understood it was a “business decision.”
“We can’t force anyone to bid,” McCain said. He called the Pentagon’s new bidding process for the new tanker contract “legitimate.”
He also promised continued congressional scrutiny. “I guarantee you we will monitor it [the contract] very closely. I promise you,” he said.
McCain, the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said that he so far had not found any flaws with the Pentagon’s bidding process.
McCain’s position is significant because of his previous role in the tanker controversies, and could indicate that at least some members of Congress will not meddle with the Air Force’s new effort to replace its Eisenhower-era tankers.
The leasing deal that McCain helped scuttle landed two Boeing officials in prison for corruption. The scandal also led to the departure of top Air Force officials and Boeing’s chief executive.
McCain touted his role in the investigation, including during the presidential race against Barack ObamaBarack ObamaTom Perez embodies the Democratic Party. This is why he should lead it. Ex-Bush spokesman: 'Media should calm down' on limited WH briefing South Sudan: Another African tragedy MORE, saying it saved taxpayers about $6 billion and brought down a corrupt contract.
It led to a new competition won by Northrop Grumman and EADS North America in 2008. Boeing supporters, including several lawmakers from states where Boeing has major operations, blamed McCain for Boeing’s loss at the time.
But Boeing successfully protested the award with the Government Accountability Office and the Pentagon last fall decided to start a new competition.
“I am not particularly worried about Boeing,” McCain said on Tuesday. “I am worried about the consolidation of the industry.”
With the tanker contract, Boeing would in effect be building the majority of the military’s refueling aircraft and would have an advantage in any future competition if it performed well on the new Air Force contract.
Sen. Carl LevinCarl LevinA package proposal for repatriation Silencing of Warren another example of hyperpartisan Senate GOP going nuclear over Gorsuch might destroy filibuster forever MORE (D-Mich.), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Tuesday he has yet to study Northrop Grumman’s arguments and has not taken a position on whether the competition favored Boeing.
European Union officials warned against U.S. protectionism on Tuesday and said the decision could have negative consequences for future defense deals between Europe and the U.S., according to Deutsche Welle, Germany's international broadcasting station.
“It is highly regrettable that a major potential supplier would feel unable to bid for a contract of this type,” European Union Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht said in a statement. “The European Commission would be extremely concerned if it were to emerge that the terms of tender were such as to inhibit open competition for the contract.”
The U.S. government gave Boeing a clear advantage, and competition shouldn’t be hindered in defense contracts, German Economics Minister Rainer Bruederle said in a statement, according to European media outlets.
“Particularly in the current economic crisis, even a hint of protectionism is damaging,” Bruederle said.