THE HILL
 

House Democrats push largest firms to pre-pay for possible failures

By Silla Brush - 11/17/09 08:09 AM ET

House Democrats are looking to tweak financial overhaul legislation so that the largest firms will pay for future failures.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) had originally proposed that only firms with assets of $10 billion or more would pay fees to cover the costs of future government efforts to wind down failing financial firms.

An amendment circulated on Monday by Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) would significantly raise that threshold to $75 billion in assets, adjusted each year to inflation.

"There is substantial support for my amendment or something that achieves its objective — ensuring that medium-sized firms are not unfairly taxed to fund the resolution of large, complex financial institutions," Sherman said late on Monday in a statement to The Hill. Sherman indicated that other Democrats on the committee are also looking at ways to adjust the threshold.

There are roughly 120 banks with $10 billion or more in assets. By contrast, a September report from SNL Financial, a market research firm, showed that there are only 21 banks with assets of at least $75 billion.

Credit unions and small banks have lobbied hard to raise the threshold. The National Association of Federal Credit Unions (NAFCU), for example, has taken a strong position that large credit unions, three of which have more than $10 billion in assets, should not be responsible for paying the fees.

"Our basic position is that a $10B bank poses no systemic risk and so shouldn't be assessed to pay for any costs associated with the failures of systemically dangerous institutions," said Steve Verdier, senior vice president at the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA). "We believe the threshold should be much higher, perhaps up to $50B. Our original testimony was that only institutions identified as systemically risky should be assessed."

The fee system has been a key source of controversy and lobbying in the broader bill that aims to give government regulators additional power to take over failing financial firms. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said that so-called "resolution authority" is a central element of the overhaul effort so that government officials are not faced with future situations where they need to turn to Congress for emergency bailout money in the middle of a crisis.

Source:
http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/finance-economy/68069-house-dems-push-largest-firms-to-pre-pay-reform

Comments (8)

Once again our democrat liberal friends get the equation bass ackwards.This stroke of brilliance will do 2 things: the cost of this will be passed on to us in higher fees and it will take millions of dollars away from a potential rehiring effort by the institutions. All to cover Barney, Chris D. et al collective behinds because they can't figure out how to enforce the laws already on the books. If they weren't so counterproducti ve they would almost be comical.BY Beesman on 11/17/2009 at 09:18
BEESMAN : They are comical. Our Government has become the historical equivilant of PT Barnums Circus. All theee rings of it. The House , the Senate and the Executive Branch. The Ringmasters being Harry Reid and Nancy Palosi and the "Barker out front selling tickets is President Obama. All the Clowns ( led by Joe Biden and Co. Frank , Dodd , Shumer and the rest of the Laugh-a-lot croud entertaining the audience. ) are lined up and ready to make us laugh. The only thing is that it's "not funny". They are destroying our way of life…Emo ZipperBY Emo Zipper on 11/17/2009 at 10:34
Three ring circus with a freak sideshow. You have Harry Reid as the MC misdirecting your attention to the center circle. You have Obama making the military run around in circles like the horses instead of attacking the problem. You have Nancy driving the clown car and having all the left wing clowns pileing out of the car. Then you have Barney Frank in the side show doing sword swallowing tricks. While ACORN is the one passing out bags of nuts with each sub prime mortgage that one cannot afford in the first place.BY Jim NY on 11/17/2009 at 10:56
Gettin' purty durn close to "Jake" territory, there Jimbo. Did acorn give out the mortgages? With a pretty bow a ribbon on top? That's right— no. No they didn't. They're not a bank. And didn't give sub-prime loan recipients the super-thick paperwork to fill out to get the homes they couldn't afford. That there'd be the banks we owe so much to right now.BY Honest Abe on 11/17/2009 at 12:02
Honest Abe..did the Clinton team threaten banks with discrimination if they didn't loan to them? Didn't Barney say "All is well with Fanie and Freddie?" You're full of ish.BY JamesJ on 11/17/2009 at 15:35
Brad Sherman just voted to extend the free home loan downpayment grant program for illegal aliens buying homes in America program. He's psycho.BY Smitty on 11/17/2009 at 15:49
Smitty : He is "not" alone…Emo ZipperBY Emo Zipper on 11/17/2009 at 16:19
Smitty, yer nuts. I just got that $8k loan program—- without it, my wife I might not have been able to afford the 20% that's bein' demanded as downpayment right now, due to the credit constriction. Stop with the knee-jerk stupidity. Ain't no illegal immigrants getting the 1st-time homebuyer credit. And it's just blatant stupidity to waste your time suggesting it.BY Honest Abe on 11/17/2009 at 16:49

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.