THE HILL
 

ECONOMY: Smoke and mirrors

By Ian Swanson - 11/18/09 07:36 AM ET

Arguing that the return of unused or returned TARP funds represents a budget deficit involves a heavy dose of smoke and mirrors, according to the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.

“It’s the ultimate in spin exercise,” Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) said of the administration’s floated plan to put toward the deficit $210 billion in funds never used or paid back by banks.

Gregg helped write the TARP law, which specifically states that TARP funds paid back by the banks are to go to debt relief. So saying that you’re going to do so is really just following the statute’s intent.

As for the funds not spent, “you don’t get debt reduction if the money is not spent,” Gregg said.

He also said the $700 billion TARP was sold on the idea that all of the funds would not be needed. The idea was to create a large fund to create confidence the U.S. would back up the financial system.

Source:
http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/finance-economy/68301-economy-smoke-and-mirrors

Comments (1)

11/17/09Just say YES! …to JOBSTwo headlines this morning:The worst is yet to come: Unemployed Americans should hunker down for more job lossesGov't Wastes $98B in Taxpayer Dollars in 2009Ok, so www.savingpontiac.org has been advocating that it is possible to save 40,000 jobs, overnight, by saving the Pontiac Brand and some factories that GM is not using. Do the taxpayers understand that these assets belong to them and are being withheld from use in this horrible economy; for some reason? We have asked for 4% of what the Federal Government is known to have wasted in 2009 ($4 Billion). This is 1% of the available TARP money. This amount to save 40,000 jobs is less than one half (½) of 1% of the TARP allocation. What is the holdup?To expand, if the Saturn Brand and the Pontiac Brand were saved, it would amount to approximately 200,000 jobs almost overnight. While the cost could rise to $9 to $10 billion this is likely less than the amount of money GM will send to Europe to try and revive the old worn brand Opal. One has to wonder why this is so hard? Think of it this way: To create 200,000 jobs takes a single YES by either our President or The Secretary of the Treasury. They can vote the 61% owned shares of General Motors to release the assets; they can disburse the funds that are available under TARP. All of this with a single YES and without the consent or argument of Congress. Frankly the logic escapes us at www.savingpontiac.org. All we need is one YES and 200,000 jobs are created. This is important to the economy in terms of contribution but it is a single act by Government that could actually give confidence to the American people that the Government will act in their best interest! Yet, we are missing the one YES in the middle of this great economic turmoil. Why would GM be allowed to keep our assets away from us?Let’s do something to get this one YES….Please visit www.savingpontiac.org and sign our petition.BY Chief Pontiac on 11/18/2009 at 09:43

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.