Old ways not obsolete

They say you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. And in the U.S. Senate, that’s not a bad thing.

On Tuesday, the upper chamber saw an eleventh-hour deal to avert the so-called nuclear option, a rule change to alter Senate procedure that would have multiplied the level of polarization and distrust in the body exponentially. It was cobbled together by a bunch of old-timers who remember a Senate of days gone by. 

Later that hot afternoon, Sen. Mike EnziMichael (Mike) Bradley EnziMcConnell names Senate GOP tax conferees Live coverage: Senate Republicans pass tax bill The Hill's Whip List: Where Republicans stand on Senate tax bill MORE (R-Wyo.) announced his plans to seek a fourth Senate term, and in less than an hour was challenged by Liz Cheney, the 46-year-old daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney who moved to Wyoming last year and allegedly told Enzi she would run if he retired, but then decided to challenge him anyway. Enzi, who has been friends with Dick Cheney for 30 years, was dumbfounded by the news, saying “I thought we were friends.” 

Cheney, in a video, excoriated President Obama, but not Enzi. She hinted that Enzi needs the boot because it is “necessary for a new generation of leaders to step up to the plate,” because “we can no longer afford simply to get along to go along.”

Unlike other old GOP bulls bounced from office in primary challenges by younger insurgent candidates in 2010 and 2012, Enzi has no record of aiding the enemy party or ignoring his home state. But in the current Republican Party, long-term incumbents are fuddy-duddies at best, and experienced legislators are sell-outs or worse.   

Take fifth-term Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainGOP strategist donates to Alabama Democrat Meghan McCain knocks Bannon: 'Who the hell are you' to criticize Romney? Dems demand Tillerson end State hiring freeze, consult with Congress MORE (R-Ariz.), who worked day and night to try and prevent Democrats from going through with the nuclear option. Working apart from but in consultation with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP strategist donates to Alabama Democrat McConnell names Senate GOP tax conferees Brent Budowsky: A plea to Alabama voters MORE (R-Ky.), McCain worked his many, longstanding relationships — including an often tense one with Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidBill O'Reilly: Politics helped kill Kate Steinle, Zarate just pulled the trigger Tax reform is nightmare Déjà vu for Puerto Rico Ex-Obama and Reid staffers: McConnell would pretend to be busy to avoid meeting with Obama MORE (D-Nev.) — to achieve a compromise that would at least create a truce. Now, particularly with his recent involvement in passing comprehensive immigration reform, no matter how McCain ran from his record of bipartisanship and cooperation in 2008 and 2010, his hands are forever stained from cutting deals with Democrats in the age of Obama. 

Meanwhile, the younger crowd, which encouraged heretofore unseemly filibusters on nominees for secretary of Defense and director of the CIA, grumbled at the deal McCain and Reid hatched. Texas Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzDebbie Wasserman Schultz marks 10 years as breast cancer survivor Foreign agent registration is no magical shield against Russian propaganda Let Trump be Trump and he'll sail through 2020 MORE, who was called famously by McCain a “wacko bird,” tweeted his assessment of the deal, writing “Today – re: the so-called nuclear option, Senate Republicans preserved the right to surrender in the future.”

McConnell, despite the fact that he and Reid cannot stand each other, supported the deal and McCain’s effort to reach it, no matter the arrows he could take for doing so, either here or back at home on the campaign trail as he works to get reelected to a sixth term.

After all , it has been McConnell and Vice President Biden — another codger who served in the Senate for decades — who have cut more deals to address the nation’s economic and fiscal crises during the Obama presidency than Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerJohn Feehery: A political forest fire Trump's pick for Federal Reserve chief is right choice at right time The two-party system is dying — let’s put it out of its misery MORE (R-Ohio) and the president himself.

Like so many senior Democrats and Republicans, Sen. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderOvernight Finance: Trump says shutdown 'could happen' | Ryan, conservatives inch closer to spending deal | Senate approves motion to go to tax conference | Ryan promises 'entitlement reform' in 2018 Senate approves motion to go to tax conference House conservatives, Ryan inch closer toward spending deal MORE (R-Tenn.) worried Monday that the younger senators could prevail before a filibuster deal was reached. Alexander lamented to reporters “there are too many senators who don’t understand the precedent of a Senate that can change the majority anytime it wants to.” The 73-year-old two-term governor seeking a third Senate term stepped down from leadership two years ago in order to help break Senate gridlock. He voted for the Senate immigration bill last month — and yes, conservative groups are hoping to defeat him too.

Stoddard is an associate editor of The Hill.