THE HILL
 

Healthcare, then and now

By Ben Goddard - 08/05/09 12:54 PM ET
In the early summer of 1993, leaders of the health insurance industry finally got a short meeting with the White House task force on healthcare reform. The insurers presented their own series of reforms to make healthcare coverage more affordable, more available and portable if a consumer lost or changed jobs. The insurers asked for a seat at the table to help hash out a plan for reform that would have preserved the private insurance industry and achieved many of the goals of the Clinton administration. The insurers were rebuffed. “We need an enemy and you are it,” they were told. That blunt conversation led insurers to conclude they had a fight on their hands, and the “Harry and Louise” campaign was born. Interestingly, few involved with that effort thought the White House healthcare reform proposal would fail. The initial goal of the campaign was to force changes, not kill the plan.

Fifteen years later, both health insurers and the White House took an entirely different approach. Insurers early on endorsed the principle of reform. They began meeting with representatives of Barack Obama when he was a presidential candidate and reached out to legislative leaders in both the Senate and the House to make clear they wanted to be at the table this time around. Early in his administration, President Obama complimented insurers on their participation in the process. “We were all singing ‘Kumbaya,’ ” said one insurer.

Only the liberal grassroots activist group Healthcare Now seemed willing to go on the attack. Last summer it launched a “Magic 8-Ball” TV ad that showed consumers asking out loud if their insurer would cover treatment and offer affordable coverage. The actors portraying consumers then shook an iconic black fortune-telling ball, which turned up messages such as “not likely” or “don’t count on it.” Ad testing showed the TV spot to be very effective because it tapped into consumers’ inherent distrust of insurers and their belief that insurer decisions were arbitrary and capricious. Over a period of several weeks a debate raged among insurers over whether or not to counter the paid media attack. Eventually, the industry decided to stick to the high road.

For their part, insurers focused on a series of public events including a “listening tour” where they invited public input about their practices and promised to work for reforms of the system. Through its trade association, America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry worked hard to position itself as part of the solution, not the problem. At the White House, in Congress and among many stakeholders in the debate, these actions were welcomed. Many observers, including this writer, commented favorably on the new position. (In the interest of full disclosure — my firm has represented many players in the healthcare debate over the years, including insurers, hospitals, consumer groups and the pharmaceutical industry. My comments in this column, however, are as an observer of public policy debates over several decades and do not represent the positions of any former or current clients.)

Now the summer of love on healthcare reform has come to an abrupt end. Late last week House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) turned her guns on health insurers, calling them “immoral” and branding them the “villains” in America’s healthcare mess. “They have had a good thing going for a long time at the expense of the American people and the health of our country.” she said. Over the weekend, White House advisers weighed in with only slightly less inflammatory language, suggesting that Democratic members of Congress take the fight to insurers over the August recess.

As the battle over healthcare reform heats up, the ad wars will begin in earnest as members and senators head home for the recess. Left-leaning groups will likely escalate their attacks on insurers, reasoning that they “need an enemy” just as the Clintons did 15 years ago. Insurers say they’re taking the high road and, at most, will employ subtle references to a “bipartisan solution,” hoping that keeping Republicans in the mix will blunt calls for a public plan and more government regulation.

Faced with a harsh attack from pro-reform partisans and what they view as a tepid response from their trade association, some insurers are advocating a frontal assault on the Obama/Democratic leadership plan. One Republican consultant told me recently that insurers were not fighting back. “They’re just negotiating with the cannibals over who gets eaten last,” he said. August may be the decisive month in which we learn if appeasement or combat will mark the closing weeks of healthcare reform 2009.



Goddard is a founding partner of political consultants Goddard Claussen.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/ben-goddard/53741-healthcare-then-and-now

Comments (1)

The push to retain the two party systems and strangle any effort by minor parties or independents has continued to be one of the best ways for the political elite to maintain control on the masses. It is a racist strategy conducted by both of the major political parties. Take the situation of Arkansas. With over 95 percent of the registered voters choosing to be independents who vote the person and the issue rather than the party, the two major parties hold everyone else hostage to their ideology. While this continues to allow them to consolidate power in many other states, in Arkansas the populist wave is growing. Unhappy with Blanche Lincoln's representation of Arkansas in Washington and the racist plantation owner mentality of the republican's in the rest of the state, the voters continue to vote the individual based on his merits, message and experience. The primary example in Arkansas is Trevor Drown, from Russellville, the former Green Beret, small business owner and UPS employee who many consider the common man of Arkansas. His refusal to take corporate money, listen to party politics and leadership style of daring to make a difference is resonating throughout the state. While he may not have the funds, he has the people's ear and he is receiving more supporters every day. Trevor chooses to meet with people from all walks of life, listens to them, their concerns and what they are looking for. That in itself is different from so many professional politicians. As he meets people, he is building support and a grassroots movement has sprung up. Next spring when he needs to get the 10,000 signatures to get on the November ballot he will easily do this. The money and funding will come, it will be slow but, it will build momentum as time goes by. When people from all over see the impact he is making, we will see a fundamental change in the way campaigns are conducted. It will not be politics as usual. Drown will eventually face a Democratic Incumbent who has collected so much money from corporate donors, it can only be described as obscene. The winner of the republican primary will either be another bloated political party hack or a racist plantation owner, who uses the church to rally support and be the fake conservative voice. Thankfully it will not work this time and a true independent, an American will represent Arkansas.BY Michael Kincade on 09/05/2009 at 14:51

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.