THE HILL
 

Quieting the health circus

By Ben Goddard - 09/16/09 03:56 PM ET

The ’70s Scottish folk/rock group Stealers Wheel had a huge hit that has since been covered by half a dozen rock, folk and country artists. “Stuck in the Middle with You” could be the White House theme song as the battle over healthcare reform devolves into rigid partisan posturing on both ends of the political spectrum. “Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right/ Here I am, stuck in the middle with you,” songwriter Joe Egan sang in the band’s only big hit.

The White House is in much the same position. August belonged to the “jokers,” with their town hall outbursts and charges of “death panels,” coverage for illegal immigrants and socialized medicine. The liberal wing of the Democratic Party has been just as strident on the public option. The fighting between the two, fed by the 24-hour yammering of cable television hosts — both clowns and jokers — has left many Americans confused and uncertain about just what healthcare reform will do to them. The White House has, wisely but belatedly, begun trying to explain what it will do for them. In the weeks ahead the distinction between to and for may determine the outcome of healthcare reform in 2009.

The president needs the middle — especially the middle class — to win. Democrats need middle-class voters to hold control of Congress, and so do Republicans who want to wrest that power away. The big-picture view argues that even the left wing of the Democratic Party will eventually concede that no liberal will lose his or her seat if there is not a public option in the final healthcare reform bill — but a lot of vulnerable Blue Dogs will lose their seats if there is a public option and they vote for it. They’ll do the math, then compromise.

Republicans, on the other hand, gain most from a middle anxious about getting stuck with the bill for healthcare reform. Fear and greed are the drivers of opinion that will return Republicans to power — fear over what middle-class families might lose in coverage and an unwillingness to pay for reform that seems only to help others.

With the Senate Finance Committee bill headed for markup next week, the flames of fear will also be fanned by any number of special constituencies. Whether the final price tag is $900 billion, $1 trillion or some other number, it is going to cost someone a lot of money. Medical device makers have launched a massive lobbying effort to make the case that consumers “will get walloped upside the head” with increased costs from a proposed $4 billion in fees on their products. Health insurers, already committed to killing the public option, are stressing over $6 billion in fees and a 35 percent tax on so-called Cadillac plans that, combined, could cost the industry as much as $400 billion. Clinical labs will fight $750 million in annual fees. Business groups argue all these costs will get passed on to their members and, eventually, to customers. As the debate centers on who will pay for whatever is in the final bill, lobbyists will be swarming over Capitol Hill and well over a hundred million dollars will be spent on advertising geared toward making the middle class nervous about the costs of reform.

To prevail, the White House and proponents of reform must shift the focus to what reforms will do for the middle class. The president seems to have gotten that message. In his speech to the AFL-CIO’s annual convention this week, he hammered home his point that reforming health insurance was fundamental to revitalizing the middle class. “We are going to grow our middle class with policies that benefit you, the American worker,” he said to thunderous applause.

Reining in insurance companies, guaranteeing security and stability in coverage and driving down costs are the messages the middle class wants to hear. If that includes some demonizing of health insurers and other industries that have grown fat and happy in the healthcare market — so be it. The middle class is looking for someone to be on their side right now. Candidate Obama convinced them he was; now President Obama needs to make the case that they’re better off sticking with him than with the “clowns” or “jokers.” Inspirational as POTUS can be, he needs help from his supporters with that message. Progressives should worry less about insisting on a public option and spend more time and money telling the middle class what health insurance reform will do for them.

Goddard is a founding partner of political consultants Goddard Claussen.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/ben-goddard/59091-quieting-the-health-circus

Comments (7)

How much were you paid to write this for the Dems.?BY Ann on 09/18/2009 at 10:42
"The middle class is looking for someone to be on their side right now. Candidate Obama convinced them he was; now President Obama needs to make the case that theyBY Rick on 09/18/2009 at 14:58
Progessives wake up! "The middle class is shirkin' not workin'. Obama say, “We are going to grow our middle class with policies that benefit you, the American worker,” he said to thunderous applause." Oh yeah right! You call Wall Street bailouts, policies that benefit Main Street? What's really going on? We are broke. We need to go back to work!BY Wm. Rhett Baker on 09/19/2009 at 20:17
Ben,No one is saying health care doesn't need reform. Only not THIS reform.the big problem is the heavy Government bureacracy , triggers, panels of regilators, price fixers, the requirements that force patients to buy health care whether they want to or not.It's not a strong reform. It's not an advancement of the health care system. And NO tort reform shows it for the fraud it is.That is not the kind of reform we want. It is Big Govt heavy hand.The Dems will pass it by themsleves, excluding Republicans like they've done from the very beginning.BY Larry on 09/20/2009 at 19:40
Imagine what would happen if we required auto insurance companies to insure everyone at the same price and we prohibited them from canceling out of control drivers. We know that they would all go bankrupt. Very few companies really want to sell health insurance to begin with. There is very little profit in it. Most insurance companies would like to make more than a 3% profit. If we put alot of mandates on these companies they will go bankrupt and then we will have to have gov't provide all health care. I think that is what the Democrats want, but I don't think American's will be happy when they have to wait months or years for care or can't find a doctor to care for them. The Democrats need to stop with the politics and look for real solutions.BY Stephen Howell on 09/20/2009 at 21:31
Before the public debate even started, "centrist" strategists and inside deal makers much like yourself, once again, preempted real health care reform (single payer, reformed Medicare for everyone). Now the President is stuck in the middle of a bad health care reform deal, with you, and people like me are stuck outside, playing the clown.Yes, I have agitated for a robust public option. I am one of those cranky, "strident" clowns who recognizes that all the health care money for 47 million uninsured, the under insured and the soon-to-be uninsured is sequestered in the profits, executive bonuses, and inefficient paper shuffling of a parasitic insurance industry. I'm the kind of clown who understands that the health insurance industry is the problem. Regardless of your part or mine in this circus, we both know that health insurance mandates will be a part of any bill — they've been paid for. And we can count on there being government subsidies for many, if not most of those who will not be able to afford the over-priced, token coverage that'll be made available. A public option is the last, weak gasp of a hope for keeping "reform" from degenerating into little more than an obscene tribute, further bloating the policy-buying power of the health insurance monster.From your perspective, I suppose, only a clown would suggest that your former clients (corporations that probably made you rich) are monsters. If you're correct, and I am a clown, then what are you, really? A corporate hit-man, ring master, or just another circus barker?BY Mike Smith on 10/19/2009 at 01:35
Had to mention that, as cited in the first paragraph, Joe Egan is NOT the singer of "Stuck In the Middle with You."Egan indeed co-wrote the song but the principal author and vocal of the song is none other than Gerry Rafferty of "Baker Street" fame. And that is not opinion.BY GRTourist on 11/21/2009 at 21:01

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.