THE HILL
 

Storm flags in California

By Ben Goddard - 10/21/09 06:39 PM ET

Maybe it comes from nearly three decades of political involvement in the Golden State, but I’ve always considered California something of a bellwether — the canary in the coalmine when it comes to early warning signs of political trends. The most recent Field Poll, a widely reported and quoted and generally accurate reading of California tea leaves, suggests rough seas ahead for state governments. The clear message from voters is that they are mad as hell at the governor and the State Legislature and want some serious changes, but they are not sure their leaders are up to the job.

The survey of over a thousand California voters showed concerns with Washington, which is to be expected. Only 23 percent give Congress a favorable rating, about the same as national polls. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is showing the strains of being a liberal icon and frequent target of conservative talking heads. The numbers illustrate the growing partisan divide in America. She has a 10-point deficit in her favorable-unfavorable (34 percent approving and 44 percent disapproving). Among Democrats, however, she scores a 51 percent positive/23 percent negative, while Republicans disapprove by a whopping 79 to 7 percent. Both Sens. Barbara Boxer (D) and Dianne Feinstein (D) get positive numbers from a plurality of voters, showing that Californians think better of their own representatives in the Congress than of the institution as a whole.

Not so with their view of Sacramento politicians. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) gets the lowest approval rating of his career — a pathetic 27 percent approve of his performance on the job. His disapproval rating sets a new high, at 65 percent. That’s a reversal of fortune from five years ago, when the numbers were literally reversed. Of the state’s last six governors, only Gray Davis (D) has sunk so low. He registered a 22 percent approval rating shortly before he was recalled from office in 2003.

The governor does score better than the State Legislature, however. Just 13 percent of voters approve of the job their representatives are doing in Sacramento; 78 percent disapprove. That’s the lowest rating in the quarter-century the Field Poll has been asking the question.

Why are California voters so down on the governor and the Legislature? To start with, 78 percent of Golden State voters think California is seriously off on the wrong track, a number that has grown steadily over the past few years as the state struggled with a huge deficit and partisan gridlock. California is in a drought, wildfires have savaged many communities in the worst fire season in decades, school budgets are being cut, firefighters and police face layoffs, state employees and vendors have been paid in vouchers rather than cash and there is a general perception that no one in Sacramento can do anything about the mess.

Huge majorities of Democrats, Republicans and independents think their elected officials are just not doing the job. They want a special session to deal with the two most pressing issues, water and taxes. In a surprising show of unanimity, 73 percent of Democrats, Republicans and independents want a special session to deal with the state’s water crisis. On the issue of tax reform, 62 percent of all voters think Sacramento should go back to work, although there is little agreement on just what changes should be made to the tax code. Voters are clearly sending a mixed message: They don’t think the leadership is capable of solving California’s problems, but they damn well want them to stay on the job until something is done.

In a clear signal of their frustration, a majority of voters want to rewrite the entire state constitution. That may not be so surprising in a state that has amended the charter hundreds of times at the ballot box, but the idea of starting over does show the depth of their frustration. Voters clearly don’t trust elected officials to do that job. Over 60 percent say they’d like to be delegates to a constitutional convention, a show of interest that eclipses election turnout.

Not every state in the nation is as dysfunctional as California seems right now, but the seething anger of voters suggests rough seas ahead in a number of states. Tax revenues are down everywhere, deficits are soaring and elected officials are desperately searching for solutions, usually to no avail. The problems are intractable, the voters angry and the vision of pitchfork- and torch-wielding voters marching on state capitols looks more likely every day. If California continues to be a bellwether, the next election cycle will be a brutal one in any number of states.

Goddard is a founding partner of political consultants Goddard Claussen.
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/ben-goddard/64191-storm-flags-in-california

Comments (4)

You left out a few things; among them, unchecked illegal immigration and its social consequences along with ever expanding benefits for societal do-nothings subsidized by — whom else? — the taxpayer, who just happens to be a vanishing breed in the formerly Golden State.BY Jeffrey Shultz on 10/22/2009 at 08:10
We have a grassroots effort underway in California to call a Constitutional Convention. No - it is not the one all the media cover backed by Chevron, ATT, the FED, Bank of America and others (The Bay Area Council) fronted by a group of Republican Interests called Repair California.The grassroots effort I refer to was certified by the California Secretary of State to circulate petitions and collect Signatures on two State Constitutional Initiatives that call for a Citizens Constitutional Convention with elected delegates and public finance of the elections for Convention Delegates. The group that is circulating petitions is called the California Action Network. How do I know this? I wrote the Initiatives, and I am the main proponent.There are teams now, hard at work gathering signatures. The petitions are available on line and the work is on. We will file on January 8th 2010 to qualify for the November 2nd, 2010 California State Ballot. The Special Election of Convention Delegates will take place in mid March of 2011, and by the end of 2011 we should have a second Statewide Special Election for Ratification of our new California Constitution.The hope is to start fresh. The hope is to model the New Government after the United States Constitution with clear concise Articles to frame our Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of our State Government. The following Articles should deliver incorporation of our Federal Bill of Rights as Limits on our State, and add the second Economic Bill of Rights that FDR proposed in 1944. That would mean California would be the first State with Single Payer, New Banking Charters to protect the People of California from Wall Street and the rape that just took place nationwide - from ever happening in California - ever again. We hope to end Nixon's failed War on Drugs, and end the Prohibition. We hope to close prisons and give nonviolent drug offenders their lives back so they can return to work and society as members. Alcoholic-Addiction is a disease. We hope to replace criminalization with treatment and community accountability where we now waste the resources of Police and Courts. We hope to start making water like the Saudi's do. California has oceans and sunlight (think solar power for those in the middle ages back in Washington) so we can make water, and end the water wars. California can start fresh. Why not? We are the State that claims a California Dream - that sparkles compared to the American Nightmare Washington DC delivered up to everyone over the last 20 to 30 years.Remember when being "for" something mattered? I doubt you'll see any media owned by the NeoCon Spokes People of the GOP cover being "for" something as cool as California starting over.BY Paul Currier on 10/22/2009 at 15:24
I think the post by Mr. Currier clearly illustrates the problem in California: an inability to see the effects of political choices.Mr. Currier accurately represents the viewpoints of the majority of Californians and certainly the media in this state when he characterizes business as undesirable and unwanted, a wart on the otherwise pristine jackboot of state government. This attitude manifests itself into growing regulations and restrictions which causes business to shrink and leave. And government to grow.The California state government in crisis? You would not notice this by going their job site. As of today, there are 2190 open job listings, including three for "Jewish Chaplain" at $4867/month base pay. How about mass transit organizations in California like BART where the majority of high-school degree train operators make over $130k a year with overtime included? How about retired librarians who pull in $110k a year? Search the CalPERS web site and CAL SPB web site, it's all public record.Not spending enough money on drug users? Over $5B a year is spent on rehabilitation programs, a result of Prop 36 in 2000, and similar diatribes. What about the $29B in this year's budget for social spending and public health care? In my city, there are two hospitals for free illegal immigrant health care, including dental care. My neighbors, all illegal immigrants, laugh at my bills.The costs of spending are dwarfed by the costs of regulation. I drove I-5 200 miles last month from the north to the south of the state: farms that had been there for decades have all withered into oblivion due to water restrictions for the delta smelt. With those farms go jobs. Or used to. Mr Currier should consider that solar energy provides a fraction of other energy sources, at multiples of the price. Look at the output of the former Sacramento nuclear plant versus the replacement solar cells: it's less than 10% of the original output, and needs replacing in short intervals at vast prices. How will he generate water without energy? Large government isn't just expensive. It's also intrusive. With every local commissar regulating every private enterprise, the spring of local businesses has dried up. Unemployment will continue to rise well above the current 12% as business flock to other states. The backbone of prosperity for any state is the growth and profitability of business. Until steps are taken to foster growth and profitability, California will continue to slide into blight. Unfortunately, the likelihood is that Mr Currier and his followers will succeed in growing collectivizatio n with the resulting decrease in general prosperity for those citizens, those remaining citizens, of this state.BY NK on 10/22/2009 at 18:14
What a crock of ultra-liberal wish list items. Clearly, Paul Currier hasn't yet realized that California voters are ready to jump ship from the liberal lobbying that has doomed this state to third world status. His grab bag of liberal candies and toys will fewer voters than the special election this past Spring. Obviously, he forgot about that.BY SD on 10/22/2009 at 18:31

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.