THE HILL
 

How Dems win in 2010

By Brent Budowsky - 10/05/09 05:03 PM ET

Democrats should fight for the public option that a majority of Americans support. Democrats should fight to end credit card rip-offs by banks receiving taxpayer welfare while screwing those who pay for it. Democrats should fight to repeal the antitrust exemption for insurers that legalizes price-fixing by insurers dumping huge premium increases on suffering consumers during a jobs emergency.

I am going rogue. Democrats can win the 2010 elections if they remember why they were elected in 2006 and 2008. They could lose big if they don’t.

President Barack Obama’s support for the public option has been weak at best, but behind the scenes there is a major effort to pass it. If the president fights for it, he wins with majority public support.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) is holding major hearings Thursday for the bill he introduced with Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) to end credit card abuses by moving the effective date of the credit card law to this year.

If Frank and Maloney fight for this bill with the president’s support, they win. They would be applauded by voters holding some 700 million credit cards who are angry at being abused by banks that announce gigantic bonuses, made possible by gigantic bailouts, paid for by them.

Democrats could lose real or effective control of the House in 2010. If they do, the Obama program is bye-bye, kaput, and farewell. The Obama years would be a modest interlude that began with profound promise but ended with business as usual in Washington that fomented the same backlash against Democrats that defeated Republicans.

Don’t believe pundits who are brilliant at predicting yesterday’s news. They were often wrong about 2006 and 2008. They live in a Stockholm Syndrome of insiderism. Democrats can still win in 2010.
Frank Rich nailed it Sunday in The New York Times. Democrats were not elected to glorify Democratic insiders dining at plush restaurants and reaping payola selling their soul and their party for things they never believed in, doling out cash to Democratic members to entice them to vote for things they never believed in, either.

I am going rogue because I believe Democrats can win if they fight like hell for things they believe in, which most Americans want, and will lose by accepting the Gilded Age abuses, which most Americans despise.

Democrats can win if they stop being corrupted by cash and bullied by lies paid for by special interests. Democrats will lose if they remain cowed into fear by those who shout at town meetings, yell at joint sessions, rant on cable television, slander on talk radio, bring guns to greet elected officials, take surveys about violence against presidents, cheer when America does not win the Olympics and filibuster to preserve, protect and defend the despised status quo.

The president should fight for the public option the majority of Americans support. Democrats should stand with the huge majority of Americans to end credit card rip-offs that punish consumers and small businesses that create the jobs our nation desperately needs. Democrats should stand against the price-fixing and premium-gouging that plague the health of heartland America.

If Democrats have the courage of their convictions and campaign promises, they can win in 2010.

Budowsky was an aide to former Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, then chief deputy majority whip of the House. He holds an LL.M. degree in international financial law from the London School of Economics. He can be read on The Hill’s Pundits Blog and reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/brent-budowsky/61691-how-dems-win-in-2010

Comments (79)

so what you are saying is that democrats know best for everything else?how conceded.BY Mark on 10/06/2009 at 07:58
what planet are you from if you think a majority of Americans support a pubic option? I sincerely hope the demagogues, er, democrats, follow your advice. The result will be wholesale slaughter in 2010. One of these days you Ivory Tower folks will get it that the "majority of Americans" want the government to tax them as little as possible and interfere in their lives as little as possible and otherwise leave them the heck alone.BY Tom on 10/06/2009 at 08:08
Mark… you're an idiot. And democrats are spineless. The problem is money in politics. Dems/Repubs are all the same now. They represent whoever can pay them. America is like a junky… It seems we need to hit rock bottom in order to get our sh*t together.BY KJ on 10/06/2009 at 08:08
No George Bush to run against = Dem loss in 2010.BY Kevin on 10/06/2009 at 08:16
The problem is that the landscape has changed since 2006 and 2008 and the Dems are responsible for that change. And that change? Not good. The economy has not improved despite the Dems throwing 787 billion at it. The deficit has increased 400% over the 2008 number and there is really nothing to show for that increase. Afganistan is going worse than it was last year. Brent, you can believe what ever misguided and delusional thoughts you want but the fact is that the Dems made this bed and now they have to sleep in it. And if the landscape doesn't improve for them there will be less Democrats fighting for a pillow in 2011.BY Ronin on 10/06/2009 at 08:27
Both parties are hopelessly corrupt. Abolish the IRS and the FED.BY Stan Lippmann on 10/06/2009 at 08:34
Democrats win battles, but they lose wars. A disproportionat ely large number of Democrat voters pay little or no income tax.(Forty one percent of the US population paid no taxes in 2006, according to the Tax Foundation. The bottom half of wage earners paid approximately 3% of the total federal income tax take in 2006.)A disproportionat ely large number of Republican and Independent voters pay income taxes.Many Democrat policy initiatives fail because they are opposed by the people who will have to pay the bill for things they don't want or need - like ObamaCare.A disproportionat e number of Democrats have little or no skin in the game. A disproportionat e number of Republicans and Independents have too much skin in the game.Too often, Democrats get themselves elected but without a mandate to govern.BY RGG, Ohio on 10/06/2009 at 08:46
Budowsky delivers a prescription for Dem defeat except for this one statement: "Democrats can win if they stop being corrupted by cash and bullied by lies paid for by special interests." Unfortunately, this is a pipe dream b/c both parties are captives of narrow special interest groups. The Dems are showing it big time now.BY Steve851 on 10/06/2009 at 08:50
You've drunk the KoolAid, buddy.Democrats won in 2006 only because the voters lost confidence in George Bush and by extension the GOP. And for no other reason.BY Tom on 10/06/2009 at 08:57
All the Dems have to do is six "ifs" stated in the article. There is a thin sheet of ice forming over hell right now.BY Mitchell on 10/06/2009 at 09:06

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.