THE HILL
 

Seven key points on Afghanistan

By Brent Budowsky - 10/06/09 05:10 PM ET

1. Afghanistan has been called the graveyard of empires. No great power has ever entered and left Afghanistan with a happy ending. Whatever the merits of the cause and the structure of the mission, everyone should have modesty in proposing a course of action.

2. Let’s give President Barack Obama 30 days to carefully evaluate all options and the mission-critical resources to execute them. Let’s suspend all partisan and ideological attacks and give the president time to consult with commanders and civilian experts with diverse views. The president might bring in former Secretary of State Colin Powell for six months to help build a sustainable bipartisan policy.

3. Imperative No. 1 for any mission is a government in Afghanistan that has credibility with the Afghan people, the American people and our allies who have committed troops along with ours.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai is increasingly reminiscent of President Diem in Vietnam. His credibility is in a shambles, and as Gen. Stanley McChrystal says, this situation must be dramatically improved.

There should be an all-out push for Karzai to broaden his government with a national unity coalition that includes his major opponent, former Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah, with an open offer to include insurgents willing to cease fire and join a unity government.

4. There should be aggressive action through any effective means to broaden the credibility of the Afghan government, to strongly combat the corruption that is rampant and destructive to any mission and to publicly define an endgame political solution that might well be similar to the Sunni Awakening in Iraq. We should employ any overt actions to achieve this.

5. Gen. McChrystal is one of our finest officers. His views should not be decisive, but should be given profound respect because of his military leadership and stellar track record. However, it is a violation of the chain of command and inappropriate for any uniformed officer to campaign and press for any policy not yet decided by the commander in chief.

6. Let’s have a hard conversation right now about approving extremely strong support for our troops, veterans and military families. We must never again wage war where combat troops lack body armor, retired troops become homeless and wounded troops want for medical care that fully meets their needs.

If we need to pass a war surtax, or enact a Patriot Bond version of the 1940s war bond, we should do it. Before any further decisions are made, we should be fully committed to support whatever our troops, vets and military families need.

7. Let’s understand and applaud the strategy of Gen. McChrystal to minimize civilian casualties. Let’s applaud the courage of our troops for risking their lives to minimize civilian casualties. Let’s understand that while air power and predator drones reduce the pain for us, they increase civilian casualties that must be avoided for moral standing and military success.

I hope Democrats and Republicans can agree on these seven points. While the president decides his policy, let’s have a political cease-fire and thoughtful national discussion There are arguments for and against more troops, but we must address the seven truths told here to maximize the success of any mission.

I would be inclined to support the president in whatever decision he makes, giving his policy a reasonable time to succeed so long as the government we fight for is credible, the endgame of the mission is clear and our people are told the truth about the challenges and goals of the mission.

Budowsky was an aide to ex-Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, former chief deputy majority whip of the House. He can be read on The Hill’s Pundits Blog and reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/brent-budowsky/61885-seven-key-points-on-afghanistan

Comments (3)

There is NO possibility that Republicans will agree to your suggestions. They hope to turn Afghanistan into Obama's defeat. With every refusal to supply our troops with their needed equipment, their medical needs upon their return home, and their refusal to accept anything other than MORE, MORE, MORE troops, they demonstrate their unwillingness to work together as a country to achieve our national security goals. They are hopeless for they only care about that which benefits them personally.BY banjobailey on 10/07/2009 at 21:18
Come on - Everyone knows McChrystal as the one who made up lies to try to make Pat Tilman into a hero. As a proven liar, he should be applauded for trying to prevent Afghanistan casualities? GET REAL. He let our own troops down when ambushed by Taliban, so that 4 were killed immediately. Also, if he had his facts straight, there are 33 million people in Afghanistan, and any one of their males would turn into a TAliban member if given the money to be one. This is a no-win situation, one in which the money needs to stay here to help THIS country. Obama is no smarter than Bush it seems.BY Jeannie Jackson on 10/07/2009 at 23:56
Swatted on nose with rolled up newspaper. WHAT IS THE MISSION? Irregular warfare. We are opposing a non-nation state organization. This is a large planet with a surplus of barely functioning to failed nations. If the terrorists are driven from Afghanistan, they go somewhere else. Taliban control of Afghanistan would be unpleasant for the Afghans. Our national interest in preventing that is what? We are obligated to create: 1. an economy 2. Central Government3. Uncorrupt public officials? I have confronted "mission creep". This is mission dreaming.BY Loki on 10/10/2009 at 06:23

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.