THE HILL
 

Democratic strategists

By Brent Budowsky - 10/12/09 05:21 PM ET

I am fed up with those Democratic strategists who parade to cable-news shows and pollute the pages of newspapers with the pap that the way for Democrats to win in 2010 is to throw mud at Republicans.

John Harwood in the Monday New York Times gave a fair account of this dumbed-down view of American politics. There is a time for Democrats to attack Republicans, but only to promote real change helping real Americans.

As James Carville might say: It’s the jobs, stupid. Many Democratic strategists don’t care much about policy, but for anxious Americans who elected Democrats, it’s all about policy.

Democrats will do more to win in 2010 by creating 2 million new jobs than by spending $20 million to pay Democratic strategists to produce dirt-caked television ads.

Democrats should wage a policy war to create jobs. They should attack rising credit card interest rates and skyrocketing healthcare premiums. They should attack the foreclosure wave from bankers who take huge bailouts and pay themselves gargantuan bonuses.

Democrats should attack rising homelessness among veterans, women and children. They should attack the rip-off recession and rip-off recovery, where stock prices soar with every new layoff while the rich get richer, the poor get poorer and the middle class gets screwed.

Democrats should attack when veterans don’t receive the best healthcare and when women are cheated by insurers. They should attack when Main Street jobs are exported to slave-wage nations, when banks refuse to lend to small businesses and when workers are treated like the petty cash of profiteers who lay them off to save money, all while collecting million-dollar salaries for themselves.

I support the reelection of Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey. But it is pathetic when a Democratic governor, running on his record in a Democratic state, is reduced to mocking his opponent’s body fat, while smirking Democratic strategists tell weak politicians in a jobless nation that this is what Democrats stand for.

Democrats should get off their behinds and pass an extension of unemployment benefits, pass a tax credit to create new jobs, pass some targeted public-works programs, pass an extension of the housing tax credit, pass a bill to freeze credit card rates and tell banks that either they voluntarily accept a six-month foreclosure freeze or Congress will enact it for them.

Democrats should attack when insurers issue a bogus report on the eve of the Finance Committee vote on healthcare that is an attempt to frighten consumers, a land-grab for more gluttonous profits, an expression of contempt for the committee and a humiliation of its chairman.

Democrats should pass the public option that is supported by a majority of voters and attack those who put insurance-industry profits ahead of the health of Main Street America. Democratic strategists need to learn to attack not the body fat of Republicans, but the fat cats that reap unearned income and unfair profits from the Gilded Age status quo that Americans elected Democrats to change.

Democratic strategists must realize that Americans are not stupid people to be manipulated by cheap-shot attacks. They are a good, fair and generous people with mortgages, frustrations, ambitions and dreams who elected Democrats to stand up for them.


Budowsky was an aide to former Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, then chief deputy majority whip of the House. He holds an LL.M. degree in international financial law from the London School of Economics. He can be read on The Hill’s Pundits Blog and reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/brent-budowsky/62709-democratic-strategists

Comments (26)

IT'S THE JOBS STUPID. Barring something completely different arising in the eternity before mid-term elections, I stipulate to the jobs theory. As one who despises negative campaigns, I am told negative campaigns are waged because they work.BY Loki on 10/12/2009 at 23:05
The Democratic Party controls both houses of Congress by overwhelming numbers. It controls the Presidency and all of the cabinet departments. "Democrats should attack when——-" is an interesting rhetorical gambit, but just who are they going to attack? Themselves?BY Bill on 10/13/2009 at 07:53
A great article showing where the democrats are at - totally deluded. Sometime between the election of Bush 41 and the last election they lost the ability to govern. Think Rayburn, Johnson, O'Niell, etc. Then think Pelosi, Reid, Durban, etc, They run around in circles screaming that they want this or that and that anyone who won't help them get it is evil, yet they have no idea of how to conduct adult politics to achieve their goals. This will end badly for all.BY Rumpole on 10/13/2009 at 08:17
I love talk of "foreclosure moratoriums."Let me translate: Congress should force the mortgage companies to allow all past due debtors to live in their house for 6 months and pay nothing, then foreclose on them.What that accomplished is: a delay in the bottom of the housing market for another 6 months.I learned when I was young, rip the band-aid off all at once, because it is far less painful. Apparently we'd rather have a lost decade or two than a painful couple of years. How's that working out for you?I always wondered which school of though on the Great Depression was correct. While the answer isn't here yet, it is looking closer with every passing day. The indecision (and to a lesser degree policy) of the government is looking like the prime candidate.BY Scott on 10/13/2009 at 08:44
Democrats should "wage a policy war to create jobs." Exactly what we need, because the democrats don't have a clue as to how private enterprise or capitalism or economics or anything else related to creating jobs, they need to get in front of the tv monitors and "wage a war."BY Stan on 10/13/2009 at 09:02
Ever consider that it is the policy war is that is destroying jobs? Uncertainty about health care prices, energy prices (cap and trade), the falling dollar, 2010 tax rates, 2010 inflation rates and so on has made employers wary of hiring. The sooner Congress shelves some of its grandiose plans, the sooner the economy will recover.BY rich on 10/13/2009 at 09:49
The problem is that all of the steps you describe will destroy jobs and that's why this is so hard to do. We don't like the banks making money, but if they don't make money they lay off people. We don't like execs getting bonuses, but they spend that money on things like going out to eat or going on vacation or buying cars or boats. We don't like company trips to reward employees, but hotels and airlines are hurting because the President told us the days of going to Las Vegas are over. The fact is that when you have a bunch of career pols who don't understand economics, job creation, what it's like to self-insure your staff, how to meet a payroll, etc. you're never going to improve things. In the past we rewarded people for creating tens of thousands of jobs, now we want to run the same people out of town.BY t22 on 10/13/2009 at 10:10
Yes it is true that "we the people" elected the democrat party in 2006 2008. The point you have choosen to ignore is that your so called "fat cats" are the ones that paid for those elections.You think for one second that Max is suprised at the insurance industry report? Please, are you also a fool? Gingus Kahn did it first and best, Divide and conquer…Looks like you are part of the same crowd…BY GREG on 10/13/2009 at 10:11
I see almost nothing in this column that would "create jobs". The private sector does that (oh, I forgot about government jobs that are increasing at a great rate) and it gets mighty little help from the federal government. If anything, the gov. is a hindrance.BY George Fisher on 10/13/2009 at 10:32
The same dumbascraps that caused 911 with the gorillic memo now want to dictate how many troops to send to afghanistan to protect us. BS. The same dumbascraps that gave us fannie and freedie and the world wide economic downturn now want us to give them our hard earned money so they can redistribute our remaining wealth to people without american values (i.e. government dependment for health care hijacking etc).Baracck took 1,000,000 cars off the road cash for clunkers program and increase US fuel economy by .1 miles per gallon. The 1,000,000 cars composed of 3,000,000,000 pounds of rubber tires, rusty steal are now in landfills and the run-off has polluted our lakes and streams and have killed over 1 billion fish, crawfish, beaver, otters, and even seals. thanks DA.BY Sarah on 10/13/2009 at 10:58

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.