THE HILL
 

Showtime for Dems

By Brent Budowsky - 10/19/09 05:21 PM ET

Pass the public option that a majority of voters want. End insurance price-fixing that voters detest. Give Wall Street 30 days to cut back bonuses to 40 percent below 2007 levels or pass laws that make it happen. Pass a bill to end credit card rip-offs from bailed-out banks. Break up banks too big to fail rather than have taxpayers pay to make them bigger.


Enforce extreme penalties for insider-trading crimes. Enact a transaction tax on speculators. Give the money in bonus payments to troops and vets.

Demand a six-month foreclosure freeze from banks that treated mortgages as barter for speculation and treat homeowners as petty cash for get-rich-quick schemes.

As banker bonuses create a tsunami of public revulsion, the president needs to toughen up. Democrats in Congress need to get with the program.

Remember the fierce urgency of now, the audacity of hope and change we can believe in? Even passing unemployment benefits became a life crisis for politicians in a town that gets little done.

There is pain and suffering in the heartland but little urgency, audacity or change in Washington. Democrats move from being rolled to giving in.

Do-nothing Republicans, acting like they are bought and paid for by the status quo, are joined by a handful of Democrats who negate the 2008 election.

The public burns, Washington fiddles, the president campaigns, Congress dithers, Democrats waver, Republicans obstruct, business as usual continues.

The result is a Golden Age for Wall Street bonuses, a Gilded Age for insurance profits and a Grapes of Wrath for American workers.

The National Journal asks: Is the president tough enough? We should ask as well: Where are the 60 Democratic senators? Why does Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) keep power granted by Democrats? Why don’t we change the Senate rules so 55 votes end obstruction, instead of 60?
Here is why some ask whether the president is tough enough:

In last Thursday’s New York Times, one day after the first major meeting between White House aides and senior Senate Democrats about healthcare, two senior White House officials tell the Times that the president looks favorably on the “trigger” proposal, instead of the public option.

This is not negotiation, it is surrender on the front page of The New York Times. White House officials march down Pennsylvania Avenue waving the flag of surrender with one hand and a banner that says “Roll me” with the other.

Let’s kill the trigger. It is a window for abuse by insurers, just as the credit card bill was a window for abuse by banks, just as the antitrust exemption is the legalization of price-fixing and collusion by insurers.

If you want to know what happens with the trigger, rerun the stories by Lisa Myers on NBC News about the cruel abuses after the credit card “reform” bill was enacted.

It’s showtime for Democrats, the main event, the Super Bowl, the moment of truth. What I propose is supported by a majority of voters. If the president fights as he promised to fight, and Democrats stand as they promised to stand, we will make some history. Nobody will ask whether the president is tough enough for the job.

Budowsky was an aide to former Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, then chief deputy majority whip of the House. He holds an LL.M. degree in international financial law from the London School of Economics. He can be read on The Hill’s Pundits Blog and reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/brent-budowsky/63747-showtime-for-dems

Comments (36)

Brent, Get a clue, they are not listening. Pisses me off too.BY jadedfellow on 10/19/2009 at 18:38
Jaded, I have a clue, dont be so jaded, actually the truth is that my columns are having some real impact and apretty large inside and outside audience. This wholedebate about whether Obama is tough enough is whatI have been pushing in column after column for sometime. Big news in the new ABC Wash Post poll, the publicoption is soaring ahead 57-41, hard for Obama to sellit out and look non-tough with those numbers. And theRepublican numbers are so low in the new poll theyare humiliating for the GOP.BY brent on 10/19/2009 at 19:26
Mark Twain said that 'there are lies, damn lies, and statistics". A poll is only as good as who is being polled. You can take the same question "are you in favor of the "public option" and ask 1,000 people. Depending on the demographics, you are going to get a different answer. Not many people outside of the beltway probably read the Washington Post. As for ABC, one can only go as far as the latest news ratings to see how they are faring.BY Joe on 10/20/2009 at 00:31
Sorry to say it but you are so clueless about the effects your so called demands would have on the nation it is not even worth the debate. I will tell you one thing though if your dems were to enact half of what you spoke it would be the last time they ever see a majority of both housesBY michael on 10/20/2009 at 08:06
Brent I don't suppose you ever took a prob and statistics course did you? Demographics selection and push polling are the rule of the day. I would wager I could run a poll where I could get 99% support or 99% opposition whichever you desire on subject matter of your choice.Informed people and savvy politicians rely on multi poll averages from a variety of pollsters and are sceptical of the extremes.http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2009/09/25/us/politics/25pollgrx.htmlhttp://www.rasmussenreport s.com/public_content/politics/toplines/pt_survey_topli nes/july_2009/toplines_health _care_july_14_15_2009here are a couple of polls taken at roughly the same time period with a 30% differentialBY Jim on 10/20/2009 at 08:07
apologies for the formatting on the links, there were spaces and line breaks in the editor that did not make it onto the pageBY Jim  on 10/20/2009 at 08:10
We told you Barack Obama was unqualified and that he had no executive experience and you elected him anyway. Now his incompetence is hurting you as well as us. Next time, how about we elect someone who actually knows what he's doing? No more celebrities. Our best hope is for Obama to give up and resign. He's totally in over his head. We need people in Washington with a skill set, not speech readers and career politicians.BY Brian on 10/20/2009 at 08:21
"Pass the public option that a majority of voters want, and end insurance price-fixing that voters detest".Which polls is the above statement based on?Everything I've read suggests exactly the opposite, and big time!MikeBY Michael Redbourn on 10/20/2009 at 08:25
Thanks for saying it like it is. I only wish we had Democrats who would enact half of what you propose. Democrat's dithering and doing nothing is why, after 40 years as a registered Democrat, I officially switched to Independent four years ago. There is not a dime's worth of difference between the parties these days. They are both just flip sides of the same corupt, beholden to banks, financiers, and health care titans, coin.BY Sparky on 10/20/2009 at 08:28
This paints a good picture of the liberal fringe qnd DC, but does noit look like the voters inthe Precinct that elected me.BY John D. Froelich on 10/20/2009 at 09:08

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.