David Hill

Since stating here last October that Barack Obama cannot possibly secure reelection, I have caught a lot of flak.

Last night should have signaled to Newt Gingrich that his campaign is doomed. 

Here we are, sandwiched between two debates, wasting a lot of time and distorting the Republican brand. 

Evangelical Christian leaders reportedly agreed to unite behind Rick Santorum in an attempt to block Mitt Romney’s winning campaign.

In past election cycles, I have often been asked to poll for party caucuses to identify ideal or model profiles for successful legislative candidacies.

Years ago, a polling strategy that was fashionable involved asking undecided voters whether there was a single reason that caused them to hesitate when voting for one candidate or the other. 

On Monday, The Wall Street Journal’s front page announced that President Obama is sponging off taxpayers to pay for round one of his reelection campaign. 

The supercommittee is struggling, and I know it needs ideas, but let’s hope its members avoid the politician’s impulse to look at polls. 

Democrats complaining about my judgment that President Obama cannot win reelection insist there’s still a chance. It is reminiscent of the Jim Carrey character in the movie “Dumb and Dumber,” when he asks the pretty girl if he has a chance with her. She replies that the chances are not good. He persists, asking if his chances are, like, 1 in 100. She says no, “more like 1 in a million.” He pauses and ponders before getting a huge smile on his face and exulting, “So you’re telling me there’s a chance!” 

Last week’s column asserting that the president is unelectable has triggered strong responses.