THE HILL
 

Democrats losing seniors

By Dick Morris - 09/08/09 02:54 PM ET

Nowhere is the fallout from Obama’s healthcare proposals more evident than among the elderly, and nothing is more dangerous permanently for the Democratic Party than their increasing disaffection.

A Wall Street Journal poll taken last week reflects a gain by Republicans in party identification, closing the gap from 40-33 in April in favor of the Democrats to a Democratic margin of only 35-34. The data reflects that one-third of this six-point closure of the partisan gap comes from a major shift among the elderly — the only demographic group to have moved dramatically.


In April, the elderly broke evenly on their party identification, with 37 percent supporting each political party. Now the Republicans hold a lead, at 46-33. This 13-point closure among the 14 percent of the vote that is cast by those over 65 represents two of the six points of closure nationally.

No other group changed nearly as much. Neither liberals nor minorities nor any other age group moved nearly as dramatically as did the elderly. The Journal’s pollsters noted that “perhaps the most striking movement is with senior citizens.”

The Democratic Party, led by Obama, is systematically converting the elderly vote into a Republican bastion. The work of FDR in passing Social Security in 1937 and of LBJ in enacting Medicare in 1965 is being undone by the president’s healthcare program. The elderly see his proposals for what they are: a massive redistribution of healthcare away from the elderly and toward a population that is younger, healthier and richer but happens, at the moment, to lack insurance. (Remember that the uninsured are, by definition, not elderly, not young and not in poverty — and if they are, they are currently eligible for Medicare, Medicaid or SCHIP and do not need the Obama program.) The elderly see the $500 billion projected cut in Medicare through the same lens as they viewed Gingrich’s efforts to slice the growth in the program in the mid-1990s.

When the president addresses Congress and the nation on Wednesday night, he will likely indicate a willingness to compromise on aspects of his program. He might attenuate his support of the public option for insurance companies and could soften other aspects of his proposal as it is embodied in the House bill.

But the fundamental equation will not change: He is cutting Medicare spending and using the money to subsidize coverage of those who are now uninsured but cannot afford to pay full premiums. It is this equation that has the elderly up in arms.

And our seniors correctly understand that you cannot extend full health benefits to some portion of the 50 million who live here and lack insurance without causing rationing of existing health services unless you expand the number of doctors and nurses and the amount of medical equipment.

When President Harry Truman first proposed compulsory health insurance in 1949, he coupled his proposal with a big increase in federal aid to medical education. He grasped the fundamental reality that you cannot expand coverage without expanding the number of people who provide the service — unless you are prepared to resort to wholesale rationing.

If Democratic senators and congressmen believe that the elderly will recover from their Republican tendencies by Election Day 2010 — or even by 2012 or 2014 — they misjudge their senior constituents. The elderly are the group most dependent on government services, and they follow politics with an attention that only the needy can give.

They will not forget if the Democrats push through cuts in Medicare and then ask for their support in the next election. Their memories are long and they turn out in huge numbers. Until now, these traits have worked to the advantage of the Democrats. Now they are increasingly likely to deliver Congress and the White House to the Republicans.


Morris, a former adviser to Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and President Bill Clinton, is the author of Outrage and Fleeced. To get all of Dick Morris’s and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by e-mail or to order a signed copy of their new best-selling book, Catastrophe, go to dickmorris.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/57709-democrats-losing-seniors

Comments (24)

How can we get AARP to change its position on Obama's healthcare reform?BY Elizabeth on 09/08/2009 at 17:07
I guess he thinks with the swine flu vaccination they'll all be dead by the next election.BY Dora Doggins on 09/08/2009 at 17:21
Obama and the liberal fascists have invested their future in gullible youth brainwashed in the government schools. Old people have seen too much, and they know better than to believe the lies of the political elites. Obama knows that the game is up on Medicare and Social Security, yet he's doubling down with government-run health care. Originally Social Security was somewhat voluntary, in that there were hundreds of already-established pension systems in school districts and civil service that opted out of SS. Gradually, though, the Great Ponzi scheme needed new suckers, so the pressure was put on. Essentially Obama is putting everyone on Medicare, and we will all sink together.BY Rick on 09/08/2009 at 18:05
You mention that the doctor shortage would be a problem with health care. I doctors, nurses, and ems personnel were allowed to receive a tax-exempt status, we would have many new people going into health care services. In time we would have a balance on insurance payments and doctor liability payments.BY Lee LaPenes on 09/08/2009 at 18:35
It is right to state that an increase to the volume of care will necessitate a need to increase Doctors and Nurses here in this country. That is why I found it constantly foolish for the GOP during election time to constantly say nuclear energy without ever saying a need to ramp up nuclear technicians. So I am all for federal subsidies for homegrown boys and girls getting a better grasp of the 3Rs and moving on into the Medical and Scientific. [***]ay for Obama with a speech to the kids who will fill that void so you see there is a point of agreement with you, Mr. Morris, and the President. We all can truly get along. peace and LoveBY Percy thomas on 09/08/2009 at 19:16
There are not 50 or 40 million without insurance, we have far too many illegal alien's here, far too many that can afford insurance but won't buy it…yet our elderly are supposed to suffer cuts in certain treatments to give to people who do not belong here, and to people that should purchase their own insurance.It is a shame we as a Nation have stooped so far, that we are ready to throw our elderly overboard! And for illegals!!BY Bobc on 09/08/2009 at 23:17
B.O. don't have the same value we have.BY peg on 09/08/2009 at 23:58
Obama is hitting the baby-boomers right in the mouth. Boomers have been paying Medicare taxes since its inception in the sixties. Obama will gut that program and limit end of life care right when Boomers need it. Secondly Boomers are close to retirement and need to be changing their savings into bonds, CD's and fixed income assets. Obama's wild spending is triggering inflation that has started already in the commodities market. This inflation will gut Boomers savings right when they need it most.BY Ruebacca on 09/09/2009 at 00:46
To the person worrying about getting AARP to change its views on health insurance - why worry about AARP. They do not represent seniors. They are an insurance agency. They are only insurance agency I know of that has a tax exempt status. Too many other big and well known supplemental insurance carriers that have same exact coverage for seniors, and cheaper too. Other organizations that are not insurance agents, but care about seniors. If you have AARP just for discounts, you can get even more discounts by belonging to AAA, they are cheaper, and will at least come give you gas - will AARP do that?BY Allen on 09/09/2009 at 07:01
What percentage of those without health insurance decided to drop out of high school? And if they did drop out of high school, should we care that they don't have health insurance?BY Bill on 09/09/2009 at 09:18

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.