Republican U.S. Sen. Ted CruzTed CruzOvernight Defense: Senators go to White House for North Korea briefing | Admiral takes 'hit' for aircraft carrier mixup | Lawmakers urged to beef up US missile defense Senators get North Korea briefing in unusual WH visit Overnight Tech: FCC chief unveils plan for net neutrality rollback | Tech on Trump's sweeping tax plan | Cruz looks to boost space industry MORE (Texas) deserves thanks. He managed to go so far over the top in showing poor taste in his shameful questioning of former Sen. Chuck HagelChuck HagelLobbying World The US just attacked Syria. So where's Congress? Senators tear into Marines on nude photo scandal MORE (R-Neb.) during this week’s Armed Services Committee hearing on Hagel’s nomination as Defense secretary that he managed to assure that Hagel will be confirmed, as he should be.
Cruz challenged Hagel’s loyalty and even patriotism — not directly of course, but by innuendo — in demanding that Hagel disclose whether any foreign government directly or indirectly paid him to make a speech. Even Sen. John McCainJohn McCainTrudeau, Trump speak for second night about US-Canada trade McCain: China has done ‘nothing’ on North Korea Trump administration weighing order to withdraw from NAFTA MORE (R-Ariz.), who opposes Hagel’s confirmation on intellectually honest grounds based on serious differences of opinions on Iraq and the troop surge, was offended by Cruz’s demagoguery, and came to Hagel’s defense. McCain reminded the Texas freshman that Hagel served in battle in Vietnam and won medals for heroism.
Yes, I and many other Americans disagree with some of Hagel’s other votes and positions as senator. But so what? He was entitled to his opinions as a lawmaker; but as Defense secretary, he is not — he may only support the policies set by the man he works for, the president.
So it’s time for an up-or-down vote on Hagel.
This appears to be the first time in U.S history that a Defense secretary nominee has been “filibustered,” but so be it. (Good reporters in D.C. should “out” the senator or senators responsible for the “hold” on the Hagel vote.)
Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidDraft House bill ignites new Yucca Mountain fight Week ahead: House to revive Yucca Mountain fight Warren builds her brand with 2020 down the road MORE (Nev.) has already filed a cloture petition, meaning a cloture vote is likely as early as Friday. I predict at least 60-65 senators (meaning including 5-10 Republicans) will vote for cloture to allow a vote, and I also predict at least that many will vote to confirm Hagel.
Hagel is a great patriot, a good man, a man committed to public service, a sincere man of integrity. He understands the military by definition — if for no other reason than that he served and put his life on the line bravely facing Vietnamese bullets. He has the confidence of the president of the United States. ’Nuff said.
While I respect McCain and Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamComey to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee Overnight Defense: US moving missile defense system to South Korea | Dems want justification for Syria strike | Army pick pushes back against critics of LGBT record Graham: There are 'no good choices left' with North Korea MORE (R-S.C.), who, among others, appear likely to vote against confirmation, I strongly support Hagel’s nomination and trust he will be confirmed in time to represent the United States at important NATO defense meetings next week in Europe.
UPDATE: Shortly after this column was posted, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced there were still only 58 votes to invoke cloture — i.e., two votes shy. I still predict the 60th vote will be found somewhere in the Republican Caucus. Even opponents of Chuck Hagel on policy issues should not adhere to blocking an up-or-down vote for a secretary of Defense for the first time in U.S. history. On the other hand, Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina makes a valid point; the White House should be fully responsive and transparent to get all questions answered about Hagel’s background, speeches and anything else senators are asking about, including issues relating to Benghazi. Expecting transparency is not unreasonable in this situation.
Davis, a Washington attorney and principal in the firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates, specializing in legal crisis management and dispute resolution, served as President Clinton’s special counsel from 1996-98 and as a member of President Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board from 2006-07. He currently serves as special counsel to Dilworth Paxson and is the author of the forthcoming book, Crisis Tales: Five Rules for Coping With Crises in Business, Politics, and Life, to be published by Simon & Schuster in March.