THE HILL
 

Putting the unemployed to work for AmeriCorps — and how to pay for it

By Lanny Davis - 10/21/09 06:46 PM ET

The national unemployment figure announced as of the end of September is bleak and distressing: 9.8 percent. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed has more than doubled — an increase of 7.6 million, to 15.1 million people. If you take into account those who are unemployed but have stopped looking for jobs, the number is probably over 17 million.

But the situation is far worse when you break it down into segments of the population. African-American unemployment is at least 15.4 percent — more than 60 percent higher than among white males.

So what to do? The president’s stimulus package may have resulted in the unemployment figure being lower than would otherwise be the case.

That’s a difficult case to prove. But we need some new ideas to create new jobs — immediately. The human tragedies of pervasive unemployment throughout our country cannot wait the one to two years some say it will take before the stimulus programs fully kick in and start creating millions of new jobs.

So here’s my idea: Every able-bodied person who receives unemployment compensation should be required to volunteer part-time for AmeriCorps, the American public service program begun by President Bill Clinton in 1993. (In April 2009, President Barack Obama signed legislation tripling the appropriation for AmeriCorps to its current total of $5.7 billion over eight years.) I say part-time because they need at least one day a week to go job-hunting, a requirement in order to continue to receive unemployment benefits. I propose this be a requirement because it’s only fair for recipients of unemployment payments to give back to the community. Moreover, for most it will be a positive experience — getting them out of the house and increasing feelings of self–worth.

By using AmeriCorps as the structure to absorb these new workers and put them to work immediately, no new bureaucracy need be created. And we know these are not “make-work” jobs but real contributions to the public good, as AmeriCorps has proven over the years.

For example, right now, AmeriCorps workers are mentoring and tutoring children living in poverty, caring for the elderly, cleaning up neighborhoods and national forests, repairing old houses, working in hospitals and emergency rooms, teaching computer skills, cleaning up streets in inner-city neighborhoods, working in national parks on conservation and other environmental projects and supplementing skilled workers on current roads, bridges and public-utilities construction and rehabilitation projects.

This is not meant to be a permanent public works program. It is meant to be temporary, until the private sector rebounds from the near-total disaster of last year’s meltdown.

How to finance? I don’t know the exact cost required — I’ll leave the Congressional Budget Office or other budget experts to figure that out — but I’ll take a stab at three possible sources of financing.

First, use at least some of the funds already being paid for unemployment compensation (financed by an eight-tenths-of-1-percent payment by employers to the IRS, and administered by the states).

Second, add new money diverted from the currently funded stimulus program — again, specifically paid to AmeriCorps and required to be used to hire new people from the ranks of the unemployed. .

Third, if necessary, add a temporary, special surtax — for example, 1 percent for those earning more than $100,000 a year, 2 percent between $250,000 and $500,000 and 3 percent above $500,000. This would result, roughly at an average marginal rate of 40 percent, of a per-person incremental cost of $400, $800 and $1,200 per person per year, respectively. The surtax would be “sunsetted” and would therefore need to be renewed each year. As unemployment drops, the surtax would be phased out entirely, say at 5 percent or lower.

But, again, this will be a new kind of tax — let’s call it a targeted tax — with proceeds only allowed to go directly into a trust account, with AmeriCorps as trustee, to be used only to create brand-new AmeriCorps jobs from the ranks of the unemployed — in short, not allowed under the law to be diverted to pay for $1,000 toilet seats or bridges to nowhere.

OK, good readers of this column: That’s my idea. I am sure there are plenty of ways to poke holes in it, especially for some conservatives who object to any increase in taxes, period. But my arguments to them: The amounts are small relative to income, it is sunsetted annually, it is targeted and proceeds cannot be diverted for pork.

But one thing I know about this idea: If enacted, it will immediately or nearly immediately get people working and doing good at the same time, much as occurred when FDR between 1933 and ’35 created the WPA, the CCC and other emergency job “relief” programs. Except FDR didn’t have the benefit of an existing and much-praised organization already in place such as AmeriCorps.

Anyone have a better idea for immediate job creation for the public good without increasing the deficit?

Davis, a Washington lawyer and former special counsel to President Clinton from 1996-98, served as a member of President George W. Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board in 2005-06. He is the author of Scandal: How ‘Gotcha’ Politics is Destroying America.

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/lanny-davis/64195-putting-the-unemployed-to-work-for-americorps-and-how-to-pay-for-it-

Comments (10)

sounds great were do i sign up.BY tammy  on 10/21/2009 at 22:10
There are some problems with this. Many people who collect unemployment can barely pay their existing bills with the reduced income they receive. How will they pay for childcare while they volunteer? In fact, how will they get childcare for only one day per week? Pay travel expenses to get there? The devil is always in the details. Not just anybody can or SHOULD work with children, the elderly, etc.BY patriotgirl76 on 10/22/2009 at 06:04
I love the solution of not creating paying jobs by doing the work for free through AmeriCorp but paid by the tax payer. Jobs are created when there is an exchange of goods and services between free people. Value for value. Sheesh. How hard is this? Lanny You've been in Washington too long. Get a real job.BY Tom on 10/22/2009 at 08:17
Lanny Davis is a wimp and a pure idiot. I heard this guy on 640am Los Angeles hang up the phone because the interviewers caught him in a lie and then Lanny called him back to apologize and then yell again, just to hang up a second time and call back and apologize. Lanny Davis has OCD and he is a lying sqealing little left wing wimp.BY Sendra Wala on 10/22/2009 at 10:29
This is a great idea. We need to be dilligent in targeting this money to creat jobs. I say we take $787 Billion and really target it as creating jobs, not just throwing it out there recklessly. I favor this because I KNOW that the politicians in Washington would never do something that stupid. I completely trust them to do this properly.BY John on 10/22/2009 at 11:45
Also, by the way, why does President Obama hate seniors? His proposal to send them all $250 to buy their votes is an insult. Doesn't he know that, adjusted for inflation, it costs $1,183 to buy a vote these days.BY John on 10/22/2009 at 11:48
GET REAL. Most of the folks needed for AmeriCorps have no experience at teaching, nor are they prepared to sign up for multiple year agreements because they merely lost their jobs. Most have community and family committments. The few available are recent high school and college graduates. Americorps is Michelle Obama's hot scam-de-jour anyway.Look…not EVERYONE is constitutionall y prepared to TEACH…and a lot of folks getting welfare have NO education.This is a stupid fluff piece trying to sell the unsellable.BY rufus on 10/22/2009 at 16:35
Immediate job creation without increasing deficit?1. Permit oil drilling inside the US2. Permit the construction of new oil refineries3. Remove the requirement of Environment Impact Reports on all new construction for businesses4. Permit individuals and corporations to build on their own property without city/county/state approvals beyond safety codesNone of these would increase the deficit.All would cause employment to skyrocket.BY NK on 10/22/2009 at 17:01
VOLUNTEER?????? FREE WORK????? HOW BOUT GETTING SOME OF THESE OVER PAID DOCTORS TO OFFER A DAY A WEEK TO THE PEOPLE THAT CANNOT AFFORD WAY OVER PRICED MEDICAL INSURANCE!!!BY david nordstrom on 10/27/2009 at 08:24
As someone who was laid off in the beginning of 2009, I required more than 1 day a week to look for a job! It was a daily morning ritual searching for work. This suggestion is silly…BY Kathryn on 10/27/2009 at 11:34

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.